![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have some nicks, some of them are similar to my 2+2's nick like PeterRus, Peter_rus etc, and some of them aren't associated with it. I was interested to collect close to decent sample size to find how they both running. So here are the results for 15/30 and 30/60 party full games:
PeterRus and similar: 138K hands 2.19bb/100 Other nicks: 83K hands 2.57bb/100 It's obvious that 0.4bb/100 difference is too low to say exactly if i'm running better with unknown nicks than with well-known to 2+2 people with this quantity of hands. Though it still exists and it makes probability im doing better with unknown nicks more in compare to well-known. With such consistent small difference i need at least 800-1000K hands in my bag to say exactly where am i as 'PeterRus'. It's also funny that in 30/60 games 'PeterRus' is very big winner in compare to not peter-like nicks which are very big losers. Though sample is tiny - around 15K and i actually don't like 30/60 party games as my ev in terms of $$/hour there was very small in compare to 15/30 - it's still makes some sense i guess... I decided if during next 100 or 200K hands difference will be higher i'll quit my known nicks and change them to unknown. If difference will be the same or reduced i won't do it as well as i will never ever think about my internet nicks at all. Not much info here in this post, just some for thought. If anyone has stats for different (well-known and unknown)nicks i wonder what they looks like. |
|
|