behind the glory: hand rankings

[emp1346]

subfallen, yes you missed the entire question...

siegmund, i kind of see what you're saying, but at the same time, i don't understand what you mean when you say that certain methods over- or under- value a hand... wouldn't that value also be subjective to the definition of goodness, as you already say is subjective as well...

i'm curious as to not necessarily what will get played either, seeing as i'm interested more in which hands, straight up without any consideration of playing ability or playing style, are better...

and again, how would this overvalue suited connectors if they actually do win more often than TT as you imply? if the numbers indicated that this was in fact the case, why would you not be inclined to accept that as truth?