Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 04-12-2005, 03:23 AM
Bob T. Bob T. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Shakopee, MN
Posts: 3,657
Default 77 against a habitual bluffer

Ok, here's one hand from my single tabling experiment.

Online 5-10 game. Folded to the CO, who open limps. All else aside, this is almost a one play read on the player. He is either playing weak loose (most probable), or tricky with a big hand (less probable). I had alread pegged him as loose, so that made that read even more likely. The button folds, and I have red pocket 7s. I raise. The BB, a loose player who likes to take stabs at pots once he gets involved calls, and the limper also calls. 6sbs, and three players to the flop.

Flop K [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]J [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]2 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]

I bet, BB calls, and the limper folds. Given that the BB didn't raise to put pressure on the LP player, I think that he either has a monster, or he completely whiffed and is taking one off. I've seen him raise the turn, and fold to a three bet, and earlier, I had bottom pair and a flush draw, and he raised the turn, and I decided to call him down on the river, and he had a semibluff that missed. So, I know that he likes to raise the turn as a bluff.

Turn, 9 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] I bet, and get raised. I have a heart, and I have an actual pair. I don't think that his raise, means that he has a made flush, because I think he would have raised the flop with any real draw. I think that he probably just acquired a draw, so it might be a backdoor flush draw, or it might be a straight draw. I can't see three betting here, because against this player, I want to get to a showdown, and I really don't want to spend a lot of bets to get there.

River 5 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]. Now Clarkmeister's theorem says to bet here, but in this case, I am pretty sure that my opponent is going to bet a lot more hands than he is going to call with, and that he will call with every hand that would beat me, so I check instead, he bets, and I call.

He had Q [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]6 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] for King high, and MHIG.

After that, he called me a moron [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] but, I had seen him take a shot at most pots that he was involved in, so I didn't really give his turn raise that much credit. At the same time, I didn't really want to get into a raising war with my pair of sevens, although given his hand, that might have been the best play, not giving him a chance to hit his 5 outer.

When you get raised on the turn, third pair, and fourth pair on the river isn't usually good. But, given his earlier play, I strongly suspected that my mediocre hand was going to be good often enough that calling down was the right play here.

Maybe he's right, and I am a moron, and more often than not, I think that I am going to fold to the turn raise, but here, given that he didn't raise the flop on a coordinated flop, which he probably would do to get out the CO, if he had a made hand, or a strong draw. I just felt like his play reeked of someone who thought that he might be able to steal a pot, without cards.

Good luck,
play well,

Bob T.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.