Undervaluing small PPs?

[SeaEagle]

Yesterday I discussed a hand here where a UTG+1 who's VPIP was 14% limped first in. A poster who's opinion I respect said that he would expect a 14% VPIP to play suited broadways and any PP from that position (in the hand, UTG+1 limped w/ 44).

Last night, playing 10/20 on Party, the play went:
UTG raises, 3 folds, MP2 calls (w/33)...
After the hand, when I politely mentioned that cold-calling in that position might not have been the most prudent play, several players disagreed with me.

A table would have to be pretty loose/passive for me to limp in EP w/ 44 and I would virtually never call a UTG raise 2nd in w/ 33. Am I undervaluing my small pocket pairs?