Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Books and Publications
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10  
Old 02-13-2005, 03:57 PM
Oluwafemi Oluwafemi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 268
Default Re: Theory of Poker-- Not to useful

[ QUOTE ]
Did it ever occur to you that the reason you may not have learned anything "NEW" from TOP is that the other poker books you have read are based on the foundations set down by Sklansky? Most of the poker books out today are just slick re-packaging of existing information.
Despite the above, I think it more likely that you are just missing the boat entirely. If you can't learn anything by re-reading TOP, then you shouldn't bother reading anything about poker at all because you are obviously not too receptive to information.
Bashing TOP makes as much sense as joining the flat earth society.

[/ QUOTE ]

funny, i never got from his post that he was bashing TOP. sounds to me like he was stating his personal take from what he got or did'nt get and then asked you all how TOP benefited and improved your game. am i missing something in what he wrote that you so clairavoyantly picked up on?
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.