#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Theory of Poker-- Not to useful
[ QUOTE ]
Did it ever occur to you that the reason you may not have learned anything "NEW" from TOP is that the other poker books you have read are based on the foundations set down by Sklansky? Most of the poker books out today are just slick re-packaging of existing information. Despite the above, I think it more likely that you are just missing the boat entirely. If you can't learn anything by re-reading TOP, then you shouldn't bother reading anything about poker at all because you are obviously not too receptive to information. Bashing TOP makes as much sense as joining the flat earth society. [/ QUOTE ] funny, i never got from his post that he was bashing TOP. sounds to me like he was stating his personal take from what he got or did'nt get and then asked you all how TOP benefited and improved your game. am i missing something in what he wrote that you so clairavoyantly picked up on? |
|
|