#1
|
|||
|
|||
How do you interpret this home game all-in comment?
OK, i had nothing better to do, so today i played in a home tournament, $20 buyin, 12 people total, 6 per table. I didn't know anyone there, but the competition was pretty weak.
I think we started out with t1000 and I g0t down to t700 after being pretty card dead. At this point we were still 6 handed and with the blinds 10-20, I got dealt TsTh UTG and raised it to 60. It was folded around to the button who reraised it to 120 and I called. Flop (t270): A [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 3 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 4 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] The action is to me and I lead out with t120. I figured there was a decent chance he also had a pocket pair and I could represent the ace and take the pot. I also figured that even if he did have an ace, my flush draw still could be good. Well, he reraised me to t170 (I commented that a raise had to be as least twice the original bet but didn't really care because I didn't want to call anymore) and I threw in the extra 50. Turn (t610): A [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] My spade didn't hit and I thought that there was a good chance he had an ace, so I decided to check and he checked behind me. I guess a good argument could be made for taking a stab at the pot, but at this point I thought that there was too good a chance he had an ace, probably AK. The reraise preflop suggested AK or any PP. However, his below min-reraise on the flop was really suspicious. I couldn't tell if he was just really stupid and thought that any reraise would scare me off, or if he actually had an A. River (t610): 2 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] I checked and he put me all-in (he had me covered by a lot). My main question is, how would you interpret what he said before putting me all-in: "Well, I don't think you have the flush, and you definetely don't have a 5, so I'm gonna put you all-in." I should also note that he had kind of a dumb grin on his face when he said it. It was not a really unusual comment, but I think there should be some information in it, but I'm not sure what. If you interpret his language he is basically saying, "I have an ace and I think that it's good because you don't have the flush or straight." So I am kind of suspicious of the comment because it basically says what he has in his hand. That leads me to believe he might have actually had a PP and was doing the typical strong when weak routine. Since my pair was only TT, I folded, but if I had KK I may have called on the chance that he had QQ or less. What do you guys think about his comment and also about how I played the hand? |
|
|