Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Gambling > Psychology
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #14  
Old 12-31-2004, 08:38 AM
Benman Benman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 40
Default Re: When Confronted with An Explanation that is Based on Mathematics

[ QUOTE ]
I do believe intuition has some value.


[/ QUOTE ]

I'm not repelled by mathematics, but I'll ask a counter question. Why is it that mathematically skilled poker players only grudgingly admit the value of intuition and common sense when it comes to poker success. The biggest, most successful poker players in the world are not mathematical geniuses. I read an intereseting article or interview recently with Barry Greenstein, who is a math whiz and a world class player, and he said that math really doesn't hold a candle to people skills in the biggest games. I don't know what Chip Reese has said on the matter, but I doubt he's a math Einstein. Doyle Brunson? Phil Ivey? I'll bet every one of these people makes most of their money off of general poker skill, people skills, hustle, intuation, etc. far more than math. My theory is that math is probably a very interesting field that doesn't appeal to a lot of people. If you do have skills in that area, it's probably a natural tendency to want to overstate it's application to poker because, well, you find it interesting and spend a lot of your time on it.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.