#1
|
|||
|
|||
A passive line vs a super maniac
He has 100% vpip and 19% pfr over 22 the hands I've been at the table. Sure, it's a small sample size, but I've been watching him play and I'm confident calling him a super maniac. The rest of the table is afraid of him except for SB, who is also a maniac but somewhat less so than him.
Inter .25/.50 NL $50 buy-in Seat 1: MANIAC <button> ($46.78 in chips) Seat 2: SB ($56.52 in chips) Seat 3: BB ($47.75 in chips) Seat 4: UTG ($58.40 in chips) Seat 5: UTG+1 ($28.25 in chips) Seat 6: KING ($51.10 in chips) Seat 7: MP2 ($36.38 in chips) Seat 8: MP3 ($27.10 in chips) Seat 9: LP ($19 in chips) Seat 10: CO ($26.90 in chips) SB: posts small blind $0.25 BB: posts big blind $0.50 ----- HOLE CARDS ----- dealt to KING [J [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] Q [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]] UTG: folds UTG+1: calls $0.50 KING: calls $0.50 MP2: folds MP3: folds LP: calls $0.50 CO: folds MANIAC: raises to $1 SB: folds BB: calls $0.50 UTG+1: calls $0.50 KING: calls $0.50 LP: calls $0.50 ----- FLOP ----- [6 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] Q [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 8 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]] BB: checks UTG+1: checks KING: bets $5 LP: folds MANIAC: raises to $10 BB: folds UTG+1: folds KING: calls $5 ----- TURN ----- [6 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] Q [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 8 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]][9 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]] KING: checks MANIAC: bets $5 KING: calls $5 ----- RIVER ----- [6 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] Q [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 8 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 9 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]][9 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]] KING: checks MANIAC: bets $7 KING: calls $7 Comments on all streets appreciated. Also, are you more likely to trust low-sample-size PT stats when they are at an extreme, like in this case? |
|
|