#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I\'m turning jason into a LAG. The AQo test?
IMO this ain't close.
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I\'m turning jason into a LAG. The AQo test?
Welcome to the forum. I'd like to ask you to please stop reading strategy posts and also to never change your mind about this poll [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
[ QUOTE ] Muck first and ask questions later. [/ QUOTE ] hmmm...my motto is to raise first and think later; it makes my thinking easier. -WT |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I\'m turning jason into a LAG. The AQo test?
So he could actually be a much tighter raiser then?
Lost Wages |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I\'m turning jason into a LAG. The AQo test?
[ QUOTE ]
So he could actually be a much tighter raiser then? Lost Wages [/ QUOTE ] Not much tighter, but tighter, yes (in the same way that he could be a looser raiser, but not incredibly loose). I figured he was likely around a 6-10% PFR. Rob |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I\'m turning jason into a LAG. The AQo test?
This is just a dumb iso-reraise. 6-10% means he's not doing this much. Fold and move on. You made a mistake. All the posts point to the same thing. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I\'m turning jason into a LAG. The AQo test?
[ QUOTE ]
This is just a dumb iso-reraise. 6-10% means he's not doing this much. Fold and move on. You made a mistake. All the posts point to the same thing. [/ QUOTE ] Your post wasn't all that helpful -- but I'm not sure if it was meant to be. Your equity is very rarely bad in this situation (it takes him being much less than a 6% PFR for your equity to ever be a lot worse than "fair share"), you have position, you have initiative, and you've got a terrible player subsidizing any losses in the form of dead money. Even if you disagree with a 3-bet here it's very rarely a "dumb" isoraise. AFAIC you've got a pretty strong holding here and the opportunity to use it to your advantage. Rob |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I\'m turning jason into a LAG. The AQo test?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] This is just a dumb iso-reraise. 6-10% means he's not doing this much. Fold and move on. You made a mistake. All the posts point to the same thing. [/ QUOTE ] Your post wasn't all that helpful -- but I'm not sure if it was meant to be. Your equity is very rarely bad in this situation (it takes him being much less than a 6% PFR for your equity to ever be a lot worse than "fair share"), you have position, you have initiative, and you've got a terrible player subsidizing any losses in the form of dead money. Even if you disagree with a 3-bet here it's very rarely a "dumb" isoraise. AFAIC you've got a pretty strong holding here and the opportunity to use it to your advantage. Rob [/ QUOTE ] Do you ever cold call here or do you think it's raise or fold? |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I\'m turning jason into a LAG. The AQo test?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] This is just a dumb iso-reraise. 6-10% means he's not doing this much. Fold and move on. You made a mistake. All the posts point to the same thing. [/ QUOTE ] Your post wasn't all that helpful -- but I'm not sure if it was meant to be. Your equity is very rarely bad in this situation (it takes him being much less than a 6% PFR for your equity to ever be a lot worse than "fair share"), you have position, you have initiative, and you've got a terrible player subsidizing any losses in the form of dead money. Even if you disagree with a 3-bet here it's very rarely a "dumb" isoraise. AFAIC you've got a pretty strong holding here and the opportunity to use it to your advantage. Rob [/ QUOTE ] Do you ever cold call here or do you think it's raise or fold? [/ QUOTE ] I 3-bet because I think initiative is going to be at least somewhat helpful in folding 6 outers incorrectly on the flop and occasionally folding better hands (i.e. folding 88 on a KT4 board). Rob |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I\'m turning jason into a LAG. The AQo test?
[ QUOTE ]
I 3-bet because I think initiative is going to be at least somewhat helpful in folding 6 outers incorrectly on the flop and occasionally folding better hands (i.e. folding 88 on a KT4 board). [/ QUOTE ] Ray "Bones" Barboni: "Let me explain something to you. Momo is dead. Which means everything he had now belongs to Jimmy Cap, including you. Which also means, when I speak, I speak for Jimmy. E.g., from now on, you start showing me the proper f[/i]uckin' respect." Chili Palmer: ""E.g." means "for example". What I think you want to use is "i.e."." Ray "Bones" Barboni: "Bulls[/i]hit! That's short for "ergo"." Chili Palmer: "Ask your man." Bodyguard: "To the best of my knowledge, "e.g." means "for example"." Ray "Bones" Barboni: "E.g., i.e., f[/i]uck you! The point is this: When I say "jump", you say "OK", okay?" |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I\'m turning jason into a LAG. The AQo test?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I 3-bet because I think initiative is going to be at least somewhat helpful in folding 6 outers incorrectly on the flop and occasionally folding better hands (i.e. folding 88 on a KT4 board). [/ QUOTE ] Ray "Bones" Barboni: "Let me explain something to you. Momo is dead. Which means everything he had now belongs to Jimmy Cap, including you. Which also means, when I speak, I speak for Jimmy. E.g., from now on, you start showing me the proper f[/i]uckin' respect." Chili Palmer: ""E.g." means "for example". What I think you want to use is "i.e."." Ray "Bones" Barboni: "Bulls[/i]hit! That's short for "ergo"." Chili Palmer: "Ask your man." Bodyguard: "To the best of my knowledge, "e.g." means "for example"." Ray "Bones" Barboni: "E.g., i.e., f[/i]uck you! The point is this: When I say "jump", you say "OK", okay?" [/ QUOTE ] Nice. I think either i.e. or e.g. would work here, though (i.d. = id est, "that is to say..."). E.g. probably would have been better, though. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] Rob |
|
|