|
|
#31
10-23-2005, 12:59 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Clarkmeister has me on ignore!
who da [censored] is this Clarkmeister dude?
|
|
#32
10-23-2005, 12:59 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Clarkmeister has me on ignore!
[ QUOTE ]
The fact that Clark ignored Paluka is interesting. Clark ignore some random troll is not. Isn't this an obvious difference to everyone? [/ QUOTE ] Clark ignoring Paluka, while different than Clark ignoring a random troll, is not that interesting imo. Clark seems to have a rather strong opinion on what is ignore-worthy and he will not hesitate to pull the trigger I could easily see Paluka (or any other poster for that matter) saying something that Clark would deem worthy of the ignore
|
|
#34
10-23-2005, 01:07 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Clarkmeister has me on ignore!
[ QUOTE ]
I'm kind of surprised that people seem to have knowledge of who is on his list and how he works it. [/ QUOTE ] He's given a number to quite a few people. Enough that you can get a decent idea as to what's behind say 40-60% of his ignore list.
|
|
#36
10-23-2005, 01:09 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Clarkmeister has me on ignore!
[ QUOTE ]
I'm kind of surprised that people seem to have knowledge of who is on his list and how he works it. [/ QUOTE ] I don't even know how many people/who I have on ignore. Of course, most of the people I ignore tend to get [censored].
|
|
#37
10-23-2005, 01:11 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Clarkmeister has me on ignore!
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I'm kind of surprised that people seem to have knowledge of who is on his list and how he works it. [/ QUOTE ] I don't even know how many people/who I have on ignore. Of course, most of the people I ignore tend to get [censored]. [/ QUOTE ] This is the link if you want to know who is on your list: http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...sbook.php?Cat=
|
|
#38
10-23-2005, 01:13 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Clarkmeister has me on ignore!
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Clark ignoring Paluka, while different than Clark ignoring a random troll, is not that interesting imo. [/ QUOTE ] Views and replies say otherwise. [/ QUOTE ] touche, but i think the views/replies could be inflated a bit due to our thread hijack as opposed to the OP itself edit: ok, I guess I can't convince anybody. maybe Clark will weigh in here and it actually will get interesting, though
|
|
#39
10-23-2005, 01:20 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Clarkmeister has me on ignore!
jesus christ you guys are some sensitive fags when it comes to the bannings. reading all this [censored] constantly reminds me of every tech company in the world when the dot com crashes started.
"is that thursday meeting planned? i didn't hear anything about it last week. do you think something is going on?" "well i heard they just take a spreadsheet and look at who what non-managers get paid the most and just start crossing off names!" "my friend tony said his manager started acting the same way right before the [censored] hit the fan in the valley!" i survived 2 rounds of firings at my office before i quit. why? because everybody in the office was crying at the water coolers and whispering in the lounges all day. it was [censored] annoying. get a [censored] grip. be yourself and try to act like you understand that you're taking up others' time when they read your post so it should have something worthwhile for them. if you get banned despite that, you suck or the place sucks. either way, who cares?
|
|
#40
10-23-2005, 01:36 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Clarkmeister has me on ignore!
[ QUOTE ]
jesus christ you guys are some sensitive fags [/ QUOTE ] Well that just seems unnecessary.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
