#1
|
|||
|
|||
Nate Meyvis sept article
There is an article in the 2+2 magazine september issue. Has anybody read it? http://www.twoplustwo.com/magazine/i...eyvis0905.html
At about the 7th paragraph Meyvis says " I had purchased 5 extra outs in this huge pot." What outs is he talking about? Felipe |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Nate Meyvis sept article
bump.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Nate Meyvis sept article
[ QUOTE ]
There is an article in the 2+2 magazine september issue. Has anybody read it? http://www.twoplustwo.com/magazine/i...eyvis0905.html At about the 7th paragraph Meyvis says " I had purchased 5 extra outs in this huge pot." What outs is he talking about? Felipe [/ QUOTE ] Two aces and three 9s will beat the player with 2 pair, but would have lost had the bigger ace remained in. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Nate Meyvis sept article
He means reverse gain actually not outs for himself - 2 aces and 3 kings - by getting the guy with AK to fold any of these 5 cards dont beat him.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Nate Meyvis sept article
Bobman's right on, as usual.
--Nate |
|
|