![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: How do you rate this play? | |||
| Horrible, read HOH, rookie |
|
8 | 22.22% |
| Interesting, but I wouldn't try it myself |
|
9 | 25.00% |
| Decent, but it telegraphs AK |
|
6 | 16.67% |
| Good, but I've seen it |
|
11 | 30.56% |
| Out of the box thinking at it's best, NICE |
|
2 | 5.56% |
| Voters: 36. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
in 2005: is your total net poker cash results positive or negative?
FACT: 3 of 4 players are losers. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
FACT: 3 of 4 players are losers. [/ QUOTE ] FACT: Sampling bias rocks the hizzy. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
FACT: a two plus two poster, particualrly a strategy forum poster, is less likely to be a loser than the average player
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
FACT: a two plus two poster, particualrly a strategy forum poster, is less likely to lose money at poker than the average player [/ QUOTE ] FYP. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Quote: FACT: a two plus two poster, particualrly a strategy forum poster, is less likely to lose money at poker than the average player FYP. [/ QUOTE ] nh |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
touche. very nice.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
You forgot the "polls suck" option
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
May as well make this post suck less... A few of these guys are probably losers. A few of them are actually winners:
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Did you draw individual black boxes over each of the player names?
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
clearly he did.... in ms paint... with the smallest pencil possible
|
![]() |
|
|