#1
|
|||
|
|||
O_O
are players with these stats passive or aggressive?
player 1: 57/1.0/0.5 player 2: 43/5.5/0.8 player 3: 51/1.9/1.1 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: O_O
Passive.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: O_O
Assuming that last number is post-flop aggression factor, isn't player 3 aggressive postflop? He's entering half the pots and still betting/raising more than he's calling postflop. That's pretty aggressive.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: O_O
perhaps...... out of the 50% of pots that he enters.. he folds the flop 80% of the time making him "somewhat passive"
or maybe out of the 50% of pots that he enters.. he folds 20% of the time making him a maniac. the same could be said for player 2 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: O_O
Yes, you are right. I over-generalized a bit. The third one isn't really passive postflop. I wouldn't really call him aggressive either though.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: O_O
player 1 and 3 are both passive preflop
player 2 seems to know what a decent raising hand is preflop player 1 is definitely passive postflop and id like to say almost the same for player 2 and 3. 1.1 isnt much even if his vpip is 51. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: O_O
[ QUOTE ]
are players with these stats passive or aggressive? player 1: 57/1.0/0.5 player 2: 43/5.5/0.8 player 3: 51/1.9/1.1 [/ QUOTE ] 1+3 are passive PF, 2 is neutral AF's are sh*t IMO, I rely on notes I type to tell me if they are aggro postflop |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: O_O
[ QUOTE ]
are players with these stats passive or aggressive? player 1: 57/1.0/0.5 player 2: 43/5.5/0.8 player 3: 51/1.9/1.1 [/ QUOTE ] Player 3 is somewhat aggressive postflop. The other two are passives. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: O_O
Note that if the third guy is capping the turn, he his 1.1 aggression does not mean he likely has a marginal hand. Remember that your AF needs to be about twice his.
|
|
|