#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: dumb play, or brilliance?
What level is this?
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: dumb play, or brilliance?
[ QUOTE ]
one of those you're only going to get called by hands that beat you hands. if you want to bet here, bet the turn. [/ QUOTE ] The whole point of the hero betting the river is that he is representing a made flush. How does betting the turn with nothing accomplish this? |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: dumb play, or brilliance?
[ QUOTE ]
Quote: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- one of those you're only going to get called by hands that beat you hands. if you want to bet here, bet the turn. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The whole point of the hero betting the river is that he is representing a made flush. How does betting the turn with nothing accomplish this? [/ QUOTE ] Do you mean representing a made straight? If so, he can do that on the turn. If he's representing a made flush, he's going to have a hard time convincing anybody since a flush is not possible with this board. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: dumb play, or brilliance?
Dumb play in a multi-way pot.
Especially at lower limits. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: dumb play, or brilliance?
I think this play might be an option if you're up against 1-2 opponents instead of 4. I really don't like the idea of pushing my whole stack into 4 other players with 5 high. The chance of getting called is just too high.
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: dumb play, or brilliance?
Risking 775 to win 400 certainly is not dumb. Not sure I would have the stones to makes this play. What's more... I'm definitely not trying this move at the 33s or lower (you're DEFINITELY getting called with a high card King at the 11s and lower).
Does anyone else prefer a push on the turn? |
|
|