#1
|
|||
|
|||
From Josh Arieh\'s website
Well anyway... ROOT FOR IVEY!!!!! I promise its the best thing for poker if he wins... If Ivey wins, the ratings on the ESPN show will be so rediculous, you wont even have to be a winning player anymore to make a living playing poker..... so GO PHIL IVEY!!!!!!!!!!!
What are everyone's thoughts on this? Agree? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: From Josh Arieh\'s website
he should learn how to spell
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: From Josh Arieh\'s website
how many bad players will he bring in if he wins? all i can see happening is more blacks playing and maybe a little bit more fish
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: From Josh Arieh\'s website
[ QUOTE ]
he should learn how to spell [/ QUOTE ] That request is rediculous. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: From Josh Arieh\'s website
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] he should learn how to spell [/ QUOTE ] That request is rediculous. [/ QUOTE ] funniest post of the day. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: From Josh Arieh\'s website
[ QUOTE ]
he should learn how to spell [/ QUOTE ] At the end of his entry is this. p.s.. I'm too tired to proof this |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: From Josh Arieh\'s website
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] he should learn how to spell [/ QUOTE ] That request is rediculous. [/ QUOTE ] funniest post of the day. [/ QUOTE ] slow day? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: From Josh Arieh\'s website
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] he should learn how to spell [/ QUOTE ] That request is rediculous. [/ QUOTE ] funniest post of the day. [/ QUOTE ] definately |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: From Josh Arieh\'s website
I don't understand how it can be the best thing for poker. Wouldn't it just prove that you have to be a top player to do well? I'm confused by his statement completely. I don't see any logic in it. Would Sammy Farha winning in 2003 have been better for poker than Moneymaker?
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: From Josh Arieh\'s website
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] he should learn how to spell [/ QUOTE ] That request is rediculous. [/ QUOTE ] funniest post of the day. [/ QUOTE ] slow day? [/ QUOTE ] Hey, some people get it for a great point by point analysis of the play of a hand, or for discussing a new way to play a big stack in an MTT. I get it for being a sarcastic dick. 2+2, I love ya. |
|
|