![]() |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
probably pineapple or 3-card poker
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'd probably pick limit hold'em. Playing live blinds well in a heads up situation with not that much leverage requires a lot of poker skill IMO.
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
I am not sure if this is what you mean, but if the question is really "In which game would a superior player hold the most significant edge" I really think 7 card stud hi/low is the game. I think a poor player has virtually no chance against an expert heads up. I would even say a very good player has a very small chance against against a pro.
NL hold'em heads up is definately not like that. Although very deep stack, non-tournament structure has alot of skill to it, bad players can get lucky cards, or big suck-outs, and the no-limit nature of the thing can make one lucky hand so much more significant/devistating. Did anyone see the celebrity who beat Johnny Chan heads up on TV the other night? I think the problem with Stud hi/low is that I could see two truly great players stalemating that game for very long periods of time. |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
NL Razz, no question.
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
PL Holdem
|
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
3-card poker [/ QUOTE ] Easily, just give the trophy to the guy who refuses to play due to the house edge. |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Blind man's bluff. No doubt at all. [/ QUOTE ] wasn't moneymaker on the final table of this? |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
Heads-up NL 5 card stud, by a mile.
There is so much skill involved in it, a weaker player has almost no chance. Similar to chess. |
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Chess. [/ QUOTE ] Go. |
![]() |
|
|