New Pick your Favorite!

blingice · #1 03-15-2005, 05:10 PM

Alrighty.

[img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

Bling.

SackUp · #2 03-15-2005, 05:35 PM

How are the cryptos still not on here??

moondogg · #3 03-15-2005, 06:00 PM

[ QUOTE ]
How are the cryptos still not on here??

[/ QUOTE ]

Do you really think the Crypto's are going to be able to compete with Full Tilt's 2 votes?

Seriously, WhoTF voted for Full Tilt?

playersare · #4 03-15-2005, 06:30 PM

missing from first list:
Cryptos

missing from second list:
bonii + rakeback
PT/GT compatibility

Jack of Arcades · #5 03-15-2005, 07:13 PM

I did. Razz tables are so soft it's ridiculous.

moondogg · #6 03-15-2005, 07:39 PM

[ QUOTE ]
I did. Razz tables are so soft it's ridiculous.

[/ QUOTE ]

Huh. I was not aware that Razz was available online. Guess I'll have to actually read those examples from TOP.

BradleyT · #7 03-15-2005, 08:03 PM

Full Tilt is up to 2,000+ players at night. It's going to be a real contender after the 2005 WSOP.

TheTimeIsUp · #8 03-15-2005, 08:12 PM

Why rag on full tilt? From what I have seen, support is great, and I love the look of the tables. Sold site.

Tboner7 · #9 03-15-2005, 08:13 PM

I like Full Tilt because of the graphics. It makes it more fun. Dark boring graphics like Pokerroom and some others just make me feel bored. I'm a very visual person. [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]
And I like the micro/nano (no)limits, since I have a tiny bankroll.

moondogg · #10 03-15-2005, 08:15 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Why rag on full tilt? From what I have seen, support is great, and I love the look of the tables. Sold site.

[/ QUOTE ]

Because support and graphics are two of least important factors to me.

View Poll Results: Red Curry...who?
El Diablo, clearly.	6	37.50%
Ray Zee, I'll let other's elaborate.	2	12.50%
An FBI agent, trolling for poker-loving pedophiles	1	6.25%
All of the above (i'll let other's elaborate).	4	25.00%
Someone not herein mentioned.	3	18.75%
Voters: 16. You may not vote on this poll