Terrorism: Not just Ossama

[Cashcow]

I recall Bush saying after 9/11 that we will go after terrorism at it's heart. We will go after anyone who supports, or supplies terrorists. Just because Husein didn't cause or have anything to do with 9/11 doesn't meen that he did't supply or support terrorists/ terrorism.


http://www.nationalreview.com/robbins/robbins091903.asp
http://news.scotsman.com/index.cfm?id=1199662004
http://www.nationalreview.com/robbins/robbins091903.asp

Am I way off base? I don't see how arguing that because the Government thought there were WMD or whatever reason they give matters.
We stated we would go after terrorism and we are.

[West]

Maybe I'm close-minded, but I can't bring myself to read articles on a web site that has among it's headlines:

"There’s a whole world celebrating W.’s reelection."

and

"Thank you, John Ashcroft."

But maybe you'd care to make their argument for them. Simple question though: if there was a legitimate reason to invade Iraq (not "go after terrorists"), why did fake reasons need to be made up? I believe that question pretty much answers itself.

[MMMMMM]

National Review is both venerable and well-respected, with many high quality and informative articles. If you have a blanket policy of refusing to read anything National Review publishes then you are missing out.