#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 5/10 AQo, 2p2er?WakesUpOnTheTurn
7 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] is on the board
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 5/10 AQo, 2p2er?WakesUpOnTheTurn
Whoops edit time.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 5/10 AQo, 2p2er?WakesUpOnTheTurn
[ QUOTE ]
villain (co) is a 27/19 over a decent # of hands but plays bad postflop. [/ QUOTE ] I think he has 76s. I'm 24/18 and all the other hands you guys are discussing look like easy isolation raises to me especially versus a crippled stack. I'm not limping A6s or 77 and letting a TAG have the button. I think the failure to cap is awful: 1. There is no strong reason to think MP has anything for his backraise. It looks like he is burning off his stack. Take your cheap shot and punish the field. 2. If MP does have AA or something he's going to double through you assuming his hand holds up. It's almost unavoidable given the pot size and your strong starting hand. The sooner he runs out of money the sooner you can start a side pot and begin value betting against players with weaker hands. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 5/10 AQo, 2p2er?WakesUpOnTheTurn
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] villain (co) is a 27/19 over a decent # of hands but plays bad postflop. [/ QUOTE ] I think he has 76s. I'm 24/18 and all the other hands you guys are discussing look like easy isolation raises to me especially versus a crippled stack. I'm not limping A6s or 77 and letting a TAG have the button. [/ QUOTE ] If we know for sure CO is a 2+2er, then I think I agree, but just because he has 2+2-like stats doesn't mean he'll play like a 2+2er pf. I could see a 77, 66 limp here. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|