#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Jeannie in the Bottle: Grant Me One Wish
[ QUOTE ]
Either one or three...two is just idiotic. Also, it's genie. [/ QUOTE ] For you. For me, it's Jeannie for sure. Much better visuals. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Jeannie in the Bottle: Grant Me One Wish
#1 for sure.
#2 just seems stupid. If I chose the boot camp I'd concentrate on NL tourneys. The three pros I'd choose would be: Daniel Negreanu, Juan Carlos Mortenson and Dan Harrington. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Jeannie in the Bottle: Grant Me One Wish
[ QUOTE ]
I think you overestimate how little luck plays a part in THAT game. You're likely kidding, [/ QUOTE ] No he isn't. And he's absolutely correct. ~D |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Jeannie in the Bottle: Grant Me One Wish
Definitely #1
If 3 - Lederer, Negreanu, Greenstein |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Jeannie in the Bottle: Grant Me One Wish
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I think you overestimate how little luck plays a part in THAT game. You're likely kidding, [/ QUOTE ] No he isn't. And he's absolutely correct. ~D [/ QUOTE ] Much as I respect Diablo's posts, and yours, I fail to see how you have any mor einsight into the that game than I do. OK, if you'd like to say it's 98% instead of 99.9%, fine, but let's not act like 220 BB runs grow on trees vs the best in the world in mixed games. If it's 3 top guys and 4 ok guys, then fine, but the way this was explained, it's essentially 7-8 top guys, an ok guy, and you. Let's not kid ourselves. Sure, I think I could beat Phil Ivey heads up no limit at least 40% of the time, but #1 I may be kidding myself. #2 Heads up is completely different. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|