Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Mid- and High-Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-16-2004, 04:34 AM
Gabe Gabe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 680
Default 160-40-80

Great 40/80. Every hand was capped before the flop. When someone says every hand was capped before the flop, they’re exaggerating, but I mean 80%-90% of the hands were capped before the flop. That doesn’t actually mean great game to me, most of the time. What made this great was they played totally predictably after the flop. If they had something they bet and if they didn’t they’d check. There were too guys doing the auto raising, but everyone played predictably, including them.

Auto capper raises from early middle. Folded to me in CO. The button will play most of his hands. He is oblivious to the raises and the raisers. If he is going to play the hand he plays it. He’ll limp it gets then it gets capped. If it’s capped before it gets to him, he calls. Either way he’s playing his A2o. The auto-three better is in the SB. The BB is tight rational player. I have Ks Js.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-16-2004, 05:03 AM
elysium elysium is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,891
Default Re: 160-40-80

hi gabe
do not even think about it gabe. fold. you're better off here with something like KJo than suited. of course, you would never play that either, but at least it's easier to get away from. getting involved in this hand with that is exactly how to lose. in fact, this post is the best example i've ever seen on how good players can get sucked into the vacuum of poker loss; suited ether combos against crazy crazies. here it is. this is it. you're KJ were hearts, am i right? you betcha. this is it. this is how to lose. everyone needs to read this post.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-16-2004, 11:57 AM
andyfox andyfox is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,677
Default Re: 160-40-80

Why would he want a hand that's "easy" to get away from post-flop? There's going to be a big pot, and he's going to have a draw to a hand that can win a monster, and his opponents are predcitable--they're going to check with bupkis and bet with a hand worth betting.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-17-2004, 01:22 AM
elysium elysium is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,891
Default Re: 160-40-80

hi andy
you like KJs, i know. we've been on opposite sides of this one before, but andy, this hand is badly dominated. when gabe hits top pair, he's got problems. gabe won't fold for a single bet very easily, and that sets the trap. also, he doesn't have any draw to the nuts unless he hits a straight draw. the big problem there of course is that even if he completes his straight, he may be up against something that will curdle his hand's starch a bit. i don't know andy. i'll take QTs over the KJs in this type game.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-17-2004, 01:46 AM
andyfox andyfox is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,677
Default Re: 160-40-80

I didn't say I necessarily like this hand in this situation, all I was commenting on is your statement that you'd prefer K-Jo over K-Js because it would be easier to get away from. This is precisely the kind of game you're not worried about getting away from a hand post-flop because, by Gabe's description of the players, the pot is going to be huge before the flop and very passive after the flop. If the concept of wanting a non-suited hand in order to be able to get away from it has any merit, it would be in a no- or pot-limit game. This game is almost an anti-pot-limit game. Gabe's post title describes it perfectly.

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-16-2004, 05:21 AM
Boris Boris is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 945
Default Re: 160-40-80

depending on how bored i was i would fold. But it can't be that bad to see the flop and get lucky.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-16-2004, 11:28 AM
andyfox andyfox is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,677
Default Re: 160-40-80

Is it ever bad to see the flop and get lucky? [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-16-2004, 12:15 PM
mike l. mike l. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: oceanside, california
Posts: 2,212
Default Re: 160-40-80

"depending on how bored i was i would fold. But it can't be that bad to see the flop and get lucky.'

for you, and i mean specifically *you*, folding here would be a huge mistake. same for gabe.

Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-17-2004, 03:18 PM
mikelow mikelow is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 1,707
Default Re: 160-40-80

Yes, I would play KJs in a capfest. But there must be easier games for Gabe's bankroll. You can't chase anybody out on the flop with the pots so big preflop.

So if you can handle the preflop action, play good drawing hands and pocket pairs preflop. What must be folded preflop are hands like AJo, ATo, and KJo.

Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-16-2004, 12:11 PM
Senor Choppy Senor Choppy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 320
Default Re: 160-40-80

If the open raiser is truly playing/capping every hand, you have a very good hand and position against a random hand, with only 3 random hands to worry about left to act, 2 of which you have position on.

If the button wants to call with A2o for 3 bets here, fantastic. If the SB plays any 2 here, even better. You have position on a couple of maniac who you can outplay postflop. Time to ram + jam.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.