Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-26-2005, 03:03 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default 45suited, 1000NL

3 handed, 1000NL Empire. Stacks around 1000 each.

I'm in button with 4s5s. I raise to 35, SB and BB call. Just sat down, so no reads. Played with BB before, and seems to be solid but tricky (the kind of player who raises river blocking bets with garbage because he knows it was a blocking bet and knows you'll fold). 3 to the flop.

Flop ($110): 2h3c9s
Check, Check, I pot, SB folds, BB calls.

Turn ($330): 3d
Check, I quickly check behind.

River: ($330): 6s
BB bets $200, I make it $600.

Thoughts? I plan on puking if he pushes, but will call a push since I'm committed. Anyone advocate just calling? Is there really enough value in raising here?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-26-2005, 03:10 PM
flawless_victory flawless_victory is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 144
Default Re: 45suited, 1000NL

[ QUOTE ]
3Flop ($110): 2h3c9s
Check, Check, I pot, SB folds, BB folds.


[/ QUOTE ]
well take it.

BTW/ yawn.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-26-2005, 03:11 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 45suited, 1000NL

just changed it, BB obviously calls.

dick.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-26-2005, 03:22 PM
stealyourface stealyourface is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 50
Default Re: 45suited, 1000NL

this is pretty standard i think.

i raise here 100% of the time.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-26-2005, 03:24 PM
RikaKazak RikaKazak is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: betting $1,000 a flop on red/black while drunk :D
Posts: 4,129
Default Re: 45suited, 1000NL

STANDARD!!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-26-2005, 05:55 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 45suited, 1000NL

standard, i supposed, but upon deeper analysis, bad?

he pushed, i called, and he showed 33.

my raise commits me to call his all-in, which most likely 100% of the time, has me beat. if he's bluffing air since the turn was checked, my raise would fold him anyway, and he's only calling with something like a3, a9, or tt-qq. So would a min-raise not be better? Min-raise, then fold to a push or 3-bet?

I just don't know. Even if I had won the hand that raise didn't sit well with me when I was making it.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-26-2005, 06:09 PM
iceman5 iceman5 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 38
Default Re: 45suited, 1000NL

[ QUOTE ]
standard, i supposed, but upon deeper analysis, bad?

he pushed, i called, and he showed 33.

my raise commits me to call his all-in, which most likely 100% of the time, has me beat. if he's bluffing air since the turn was checked, my raise would fold him anyway, and he's only calling with something like a3, a9, or tt-qq. So would a min-raise not be better? Min-raise, then fold to a push or 3-bet?

I just don't know. Even if I had won the hand that raise didn't sit well with me when I was making it.

[/ QUOTE ]

If youre not going to raise that river, then dont raise 54s preflop and dont play 3 handed. You have to raise that river.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-26-2005, 06:24 PM
edge edge is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 93
Default Re: 45suited, 1000NL

[ QUOTE ]
If youre not going to raise that river, then dont raise 54s preflop and dont play 3 handed. You have to raise that river.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is one of the worst arguments commonly put forward in SSNL. "If you're not going to raise/call/whatever, don't play [x]". Luckily, it doesn't show up too often in Mid/High. That's good, because it is a bad argument. As you play a hand, you get more information. Preflop play and river play don't always link up. If you hit a set, you don't always have to play it fast, nor are you required to take it to showdown. There's nothing wrong with raising 54s and then playing cautiously against a good player. I'm not saying anything about this particular hand; I'm just attacking the argument. I didn't really look at the hand to be honest.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-26-2005, 07:27 PM
iceman5 iceman5 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 38
Default Re: 45suited, 1000NL

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
If youre not going to raise that river, then dont raise 54s preflop and dont play 3 handed. You have to raise that river.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is one of the worst arguments commonly put forward in SSNL. "If you're not going to raise/call/whatever, don't play [x]". Luckily, it doesn't show up too often in Mid/High. That's good, because it is a bad argument. As you play a hand, you get more information. Preflop play and river play don't always link up. If you hit a set, you don't always have to play it fast, nor are you required to take it to showdown. There's nothing wrong with raising 54s and then playing cautiously against a good player. I'm not saying anything about this particular hand; I'm just attacking the argument. I didn't really look at the hand to be honest.

[/ QUOTE ]

Thats hilarious. You feel the need to comment about my comments but you didnt even read the hand thoroughly? Whats your point in doing that?

This is 3 handed. If you are afraid to value raise the river with a very disguised straight (disguised since you raised preflop with 54s) just because theres a pair on the board, then you'll get eaten alive playing short handed.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-26-2005, 07:36 PM
edge edge is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 93
Default Re: 45suited, 1000NL

My point is to get people to stop using that argument. It is dumb and never correct.

I raise the river as well.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.