![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
2/4 cent limit @ pokerchamps.
1582 hands played -- +484 big bets 30.59 BB/100 hands or 1 BB per 3.26 hands I play according to Sklansky ranked hands table. Would you say that I am on the right track to COMPETE AT THE 2/4 cent limit? Thank you. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Uhhh... Have you read the FAQ?
You're running ridiculously hot. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
you seem to be COMPETING well. when you're rolled for .05/.10, move up.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You have nowhere near enough hands to know.
You'll probably do fine at 2c/4c or 5c/10c on Stars. Mod, you can lock the thread now. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I want to wait till I have $30, which is 300 BB on 5/10 cent limit.
Yes I understand 1500 hands is not enough. Thanks for input everyone. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
2/4 cent limit @ pokerchamps. 1582 hands played -- +484 big bets 30.59 BB/100 hands or 1 BB per 3.26 hands I play according to Sklansky ranked hands table. Would you say that I am on the right track to COMPETE AT THE 2/4 cent limit? Thank you. [/ QUOTE ] I knew I made a mistake. LOL. I'm embarrassed. 1582 hands up 121 big bets. 7.64 BB/100 hands. Sorry. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
hmm, i was gonna say your original winrate was way too low to COMPETE at the 2cent/4cent online poker full ring level of competition at a typical online poker playing establishment on the information superhighway, but it's really only one quarter of what you posted before?
conclusion - move down to the 1cent/2cent online poker full ring level of competition at a typical online poker playing establishment on the information superhighway. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yr not asking the right questions. I suggest you read the FAQ, this and other relevant forums, and try to soak things up. Keep playing, reading and learning. Posting individual hands you have played that you have questions about will be much more helpful than general trend in yr play. Reading others' hand posts will also be useful.
I would advise that moving up the .05/.1 would be a good idea. I doubt those games are raked, and if they aren't a roll of 200bbs should be good enough ($20). The lack of rake combines with the extrodinarily low level of competition means you will have less negative variance. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
turn pro, make millions
just kidding. but we're missing the obligatory smartass response. read the faq, play many more hands. |
![]() |
|
|