|
|
|
|
#1
11-05-2005, 06:39 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Under-full, too much action?
Hi everyone,
I've been lurking on these forums for quite a while, and I figured it was time to start contributing and posting some hands. This hand happened in a live 3/6 game; I'm wondering what you put both villains on, and if you call the river: 10-Handed Live 3/6, $500 max buy-in Hero has a fairly tight image. I've never seen either villain before, but Villain 1 seems weak-tight, and hasn't played a hand in about an hour; Villain 2 is playing fairly LAG. Villian 1 ($880) limps UTG, Villain 2 (covers) limps in LP, Hero ($1400) limps on Button with 44. 5 way to flop. FLOP ($30): J [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 7 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 4 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] All check to hero, hero bets $30, both villains call. TURN ($120): 8 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] Both check, hero bets $100, both call. RIVER: ($320): J [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] Villain 1 moves all-in for about $750, Villain 2 calls. Hero ??? 
|
|
#2
11-05-2005, 07:40 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Under-full, too much action?
one of them almost absolutely has a flush, the other has JUST a jack often enough to make this a call, i'd say you're about 50% to win here getting 2 and change to 1
|
|
#3
11-06-2005, 06:18 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Under-full, too much action?
Live is obviously different, but i'm getting to the point online where, if some weak tightie makes a big bet and I dont have the nuts, i muck it.
While I'll sometimes muck the worst hand, i dont think it's too -ev and its lower variance and positive emotional value.
|
|
#4
11-05-2005, 12:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Under-full, too much action?
if villain 1's weak tight, i'll put him on J8. villain 2 i think has a flush. i think you're behind here often enough that you can find a fold.
|
|
#5
11-05-2005, 12:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Under-full, too much action?
[ QUOTE ]
if villain 1's weak tight, i'll put him on J8. villain 2 i think has a flush. i think you're behind here often enough that you can find a fold. [/ QUOTE ] Villain 1 is weak tight, why would he limp UTG w/J8????? He either has a higher set/now boat, a flush(most likely) or AJ maybe. In my opinion, the pot is big enough to stick your money in on a little boat, barring any other reads.
|
|
#6
11-05-2005, 01:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Under-full, too much action?
sorry. def read the hand wrong. thought villain 1 was SB and villain 2 was BB for some reason. im a retard. anyway, re-reading the post, i really can't put villain 1 on a hand. J8s that he decided to limp w/ maybe? either that or very poorly played higher set.
|
|
#8
11-06-2005, 01:12 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Under-full, too much action?
[ QUOTE ]
Oh yeah, also, is it possible villain 1 could be using his weak tight image to make a huge bluff here? [/ QUOTE ] O man, LOL. thats awesome.
|
|
#9
11-06-2005, 06:13 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Under-full, too much action?
Thanks for the responses everyone;
I called, and Villain 1 showed 77 for the strangley-played higher full house. I just wanted to see if anyone else could pick up on this... apparently not, so its ok. I figured a flush or trip J's. Villain 2 showed the nut flush. -OmegA
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
