Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-23-2005, 01:47 PM
Luke Luke is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 361
Default TT - Big pot - Double paired board

CO is semi-aggressive (37/12/1.0), no other reads. I'm pretty sure I made at least one mistake, maybe two.

What do you think?

Party Poker (8 handed) converter

Preflop: Hero is Button with T[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], T[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img].
<font color="#666666">4 folds</font>, 3 limps, Hero raises, SB (no read) 3-bets, we lose 2, CO calls, Hero calls.

Flop: Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 9[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(4 players)</font>
SB bets, we all call.

Turn: Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(4 players)</font>
SB bets, MP1 folds, CO calls, Hero raises, SB folds, CO calls.

River: 5[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
CO checks, Hero checks.

Final Pot:
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-23-2005, 02:31 PM
callmedonnie callmedonnie is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Boulder Bitch
Posts: 96
Default Re: TT - Big pot - Double paired board

I would have raise the flop. I also might have capped pf, but that all depends. I don't like 3 bets from the sb.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-23-2005, 03:15 PM
Nick Royale Nick Royale is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 270
Default Re: TT - Big pot - Double paired board

I think I would have raised the flop and bet the turn in an attempt for a free sd. Folding to any other aggression (I would have called a flop 3-bet though).
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-25-2005, 11:07 AM
Dopey Dopey is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Proud To Be Losing 3BB/100
Posts: 65
Default Re: TT - Big pot - Double paired board

Nick,

I agree with your line, but would like your thoughts on a few scenarios after we raise this flop.

Scenario 1: All call our flop raise. Turn is a rag and someone donk bets, Hero ?.... (Does it matter who donks?)

I really don't know where I would go here. Folding is probably in order right?

If folding is not correct then what if...

Scenario 2: All call our flop raise, Turn is a A, K, Q, or 9, and its donk bet by someone, Hero ?.... (Does it matter who donks?).

Pretty automatic fold right? A J on the turn worth a call if its the SB who donks and you are closing the action(right?) but what if its not SB and you dont close the action. I assume its still a call but its closer given the possiblity of a SB c/r (read dependent to fold, no read = call).

Scenario 3: SB 3-bets our flop raise, all call (I agree we are calling the 3-bet when we raise)

We are folding this unimproved right? What if we semi-improve - J on turn we'd call one bet open-ended, K or 8 are we calling getting likely 14-16:1 on the call. I assume we have to fold the gutshot assumming we are not good enough when we hit even given the odds we are getting.

Thoughts?

Dopey [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-25-2005, 11:41 AM
Nick Royale Nick Royale is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 270
Default Re: TT - Big pot - Double paired board

[ QUOTE ]
Scenario 1: All call our flop raise. Turn is a rag and someone donk bets, Hero ?.... (Does it matter who donks?)

[/ QUOTE ]
I'm folding no matter what. The scenario that's closest is if the turn brings a Q and someone else than pfr. I'm still folding though, with raising as 2nd.

[ QUOTE ]
Scenario 3: SB 3-bets our flop raise, all call (I agree we are calling the 3-bet when we raise)

[/ QUOTE ]
Yup, fold UI. Calling with a oesd or gut-shot is pretty easy, we're getting 16-14:1 (I didn't check your math here)and have 4+2 outs (we're also probably closing the action). Sometimes we're drawing dead, but not often. Sometimes we'll split when hit, but there's no doubt we have more than the 3 outs required.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-23-2005, 03:40 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: TT - Big pot - Double paired board

Given your line, I think betting the river is in order. You will earn calls from A-high, and may get JJ to fold.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-23-2005, 03:48 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: TT - Big pot - Double paired board

I am also betting the flop here, betting turn, and betting river. I think from this type of opponent A high calls you down, so you have value in betting the end.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-23-2005, 04:37 PM
Luke Luke is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 361
Default Re: TT - Big pot - Double paired board

So you guys are all for continuing on the flop but you want to raise and call a 3-bet.

What hand range are you putting the SB after he 3-bets preflop and then bets the flop?

I'm thinking it's one that will not make many mistakes when I raise the flop, but I could be wrong.

Luke
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-24-2005, 05:04 PM
Luke Luke is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 361
Default Re: TT - Big pot - Double paired board

My plan was to call the flop and then on the turn fold to an ace or king, call a jack, and raise any other card.

With a turn raise I figured I had a good chance of scaring away JJ or AK, hands that I'm not really going to get to fold with a flop raise/turn bet.

AA/KK/AQ are obviously not going anywhere and against them I at worst cost myself an extra big bet.

On the river, at the time of the hand, I froze up a bit and checked.

But after thinking about it, I think his hand distribution is something like this:
hands that I beat and will call - Ax (30%) Kx (10%)
hands that call and I lose to - JJ, 9x (5%)
hands that checkraise - Qx (2%)
hands that fold - busted draws, Ax/Kx sometimes, JT, etc (53%)

With that range, I certainly feel like I missed out on a value bet.

As it was, the CO had A8o and MHWG.

Thanks for the comments...

Luke
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-24-2005, 08:40 PM
arch12 arch12 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 0
Default Re: TT - Big pot - Double paired board

[ QUOTE ]
On the river, at the time of the hand, I froze up a bit and checked.

But after thinking about it, I think his hand distribution is something like this:
hands that I beat and will call - Ax (30%) Kx (10%)
hands that call and I lose to - JJ, 9x (5%)
hands that checkraise - Qx (2%)
hands that fold - busted draws, Ax/Kx sometimes, JT, etc (53%)

With that range, I certainly feel like I missed out on a value bet.

[/ QUOTE ]

If you assign villain the above you cannot bet the river for value. In order to bet the river, you need to be good ~55% of the time when villain calls. According to your estimates this is not the case, and thus checking behind is correct.

Raising the flop isn't a good move in my opinion. Your primary concern with this hand should be protection. A flop raise will only inflate the pot, giving gut shots and overs the correct odds to draw on. While it is extremely hard to protect here, I feel a turn raise will knock out overs and some weak draws. The added benefit to a turn raise is the likelihood of a free showdown, or the ability to fold to a 3-bet.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.