David Skalansky is a joke at Holdem

#1 07-26-2005, 04:35 PM

I was watching FSN's Poker SUperstars and Mike Sexton raised with KQ 4 or 5 handed. Skalansky had A-10 of spades and folded?!! He has no right to write about holdem if thats how they play.

Psycho21 · #2 07-26-2005, 04:39 PM

Your leaving a lot out of this post, like position and chip stacks (I'm assuming they are playing no limit), but that still seems weak. I think Sklansky is more of a limit player anyway.

SoSo · #3 07-26-2005, 04:42 PM

AHAHAHAHHAHAHAH....this is a joke rite??

Degen · #4 07-26-2005, 04:50 PM

lol

everytime i come into this forum i am really trying to give it a second (or third or fourth) chance, and all i see is some junk like this

ya dude, laying down ATs PF is a mortal sin, what is wrong with that retard???

stabn · #5 07-26-2005, 04:51 PM

[ QUOTE ]
I was watching FSN's Poker SUperstars and Mike Sexton raised with KQ 4 or 5 handed. Skalansky had A-10 of spades and folded?!! He has no right to write about holdem if thats how they play.

[/ QUOTE ]

Sure lets forget about the short stack and how important the point jumps in this structure are.

benfranklin · #6 07-26-2005, 05:04 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I was watching FSN's Poker SUperstars and Mike Sexton raised with KQ 4 or 5 handed. Skalansky had A-10 of spades and folded?!! He has no right to write about holdem if thats how they play.

[/ QUOTE ]

Sure lets forget about the short stack and how important the point jumps in this structure are.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm sure the OP would have mentioned those things if they were relevant to this hand. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]

I'm assuming the Gap Concept is irrelevant here too, since it's only a short-handed NL game with rapidly increasing blinds.

Sklansky obviously doen't know his pot odds from a hole in the ground, since he has picked up so few points in that tournament. Or was that Moneymaker I was thinking of? [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img]

Hold'me · #7 07-26-2005, 05:06 PM

The subject topic needs to be changed to "Poker Superstars II is a joke".

stabn · #8 07-26-2005, 07:18 PM

[ QUOTE ]
The subject topic needs to be changed to "Poker Superstars II is a joke".

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes. It's structure is so very very bad. I don't know what barry g was thinking.

arod15 · #9 07-26-2005, 06:59 PM

Sklansy won that event, against doyal mike caro sexton hellmuth so ur right he probably does suck for betting all those great players.

arod15 · #10 07-26-2005, 07:01 PM

my bad i thought u were talking about the authors of poker tournament but you are still a bendejo for the post....