Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Televised Poker
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-12-2005, 07:43 PM
newfant newfant is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 637
Default The PokerStars Theory

In another post on this board, someone theorized that Raymer might have an advantage over the pros because he qualified online through PokerStars and was grouped with those players at the start of the tournament as opposed to having to sit at a table with some of the better players who buyin directly.

Is this true? Was Raymer's first table a table comprised of online qualifiers? Did it help him build a big stack which may propel him through the rest of the tourney?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-12-2005, 07:45 PM
paperboyNC paperboyNC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 290
Default Re: The PokerStars Theory

No. Seat assignments were random and had nothing to do with how a player qualified.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-12-2005, 09:53 PM
jumpthru jumpthru is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Washington, USA
Posts: 77
Default Re: The PokerStars Theory

[ QUOTE ]
No. Seat assignments were random and had nothing to do with how a player qualified.

[/ QUOTE ]

I've heard otherwise...rather, that its in the order you buyin.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-12-2005, 10:15 PM
valente valente is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: CANADA
Posts: 8
Default Re: The PokerStars Theory

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
No. Seat assignments were random and had nothing to do with how a player qualified.

[/ QUOTE ]

I've heard otherwise...rather, that its in the order you buyin.

[/ QUOTE ]

Friends of mine qualified on the same satellite tourney on Paridise... and they started on the same day, on the same table.

What are the odds ?? 1 in 550
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-12-2005, 10:23 PM
sammy_g sammy_g is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 0
Default Re: The PokerStars Theory

[ QUOTE ]
No. Seat assignments were random and had nothing to do with how a player qualified.

[/ QUOTE ]
When I played WSOP event 9, I got my seat assignment when I registered, the day before the tournament. It can't be entirely random since registration wasn't closed and they didn't know how many people would be playing.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-13-2005, 08:16 PM
duma duma is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The OC
Posts: 213
Default Re: The PokerStars Theory

[ QUOTE ]
No. Seat assignments were random and had nothing to do with how a player qualified.

[/ QUOTE ]

it is definately not random. i was there yesterday to watch my freind play in the $1000 NL event and 2 of the guys that were in front of him in line were seated at the exact same table. and on top of that, he was in seat 10 and the two other guys were in seat 8 and 9 respectively.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-12-2005, 07:55 PM
Steel Aces Steel Aces is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 17
Default Re: The PokerStars Theory

I also heard from this kid, who said that a guy told him that the tournament staff started Greg at table #1 and filled it up with other internet qualifiers. Then whenever he busts a player, the tournament staff searches through the rest of the field for the biggest fish who has sucked out to get a pile of chips, then puts that player at Greg's table.

[img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-12-2005, 08:29 PM
AngusThermopyle AngusThermopyle is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ankh-Morpork
Posts: 308
Default Re: The PokerStars Theory

[ QUOTE ]
I also heard from this kid, who said that a guy told him that the tournament staff started Greg at table #1 and filled it up with other internet qualifiers. Then whenever he busts a player, the tournament staff searches through the rest of the field for the biggest fish who has sucked out to get a pile of chips, then puts that player at Greg's table.

[img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Really? [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-12-2005, 08:39 PM
Freshc Freshc is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3
Default Re: The PokerStars Theory

At band camp, I heard that they mix chicken bones with llama eyeballs to determine who sits with Greg Raymer. Use your friggin' brain, does this sound even vaguely plausible?!!! Argghhh.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-12-2005, 08:51 PM
EvilDrSluggo EvilDrSluggo is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 8
Default Re: The PokerStars Theory

I heard he was secretly using a pattern mapper.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.