|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Worst case scenarios (Downswing simulations)
The point of this post is to look at how downswings are related to what level you play at (or in other words your ROI)
These numbers are simulated from 1 million SNGs per ROI. These are 10+1 ROI (finish distribution) 24% (14-12-13) Longest OOTM streak: 27 Longest ITM streak: 15 Largest downswing: $522 20% (13-12-13) Longest OOTM streak: 24 Longest ITM streak: 14 Largest downswing: $734 11% (12-11-12) Longest OOTM streak: 29 Longest ITM streak: 12 Largest downswing: $1122 4.5% (11-11-11) Longest OOTM streak: 33 Longest ITM streak: 12 Largest downswing: $2252 My own conclusion - Playing lower buyins will definately lower your swings - Impressive enough there's room for more variance than I thought over a million SNGs - You can have pretty naaaaasty downswings |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Worst case scenarios (Downswing simulations)
If if ever take 100 buy in downswing im killing myself.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Worst case scenarios (Downswing simulations)
[ QUOTE ]
If if ever take 100 buy in downswing im killing myself. [/ QUOTE ] Then I would like to bet you would never ever hit a 200 buyin drop =) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Worst case scenarios (Downswing simulations)
A million SNGs is a bit unrealistic for anybody but raptor don't you think?
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Worst case scenarios (Downswing simulations)
How do you conclude that the size of the buy-in effects the variance when this is all 10+1's? I know it's simmed anyway, and it seems like common sense, but it's not really proven.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Worst case scenarios (Downswing simulations)
[ QUOTE ]
How do you conclude that the size of the buy-in effects the variance when this is all 10+1's? I know it's simmed anyway, and it seems like common sense, but it's not really proven. [/ QUOTE ] Well the swings are obviously twice as big if these were 20s [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Worst case scenarios (Downswing simulations)
Because ROI goes down the higher you play. These numbers goes for all buyins, the only reason for me to say this is 10+1 is because largest downswing is in $$$
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Worst case scenarios (Downswing simulations)
I hit -80 buyins at one point. Not cool.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Worst case scenarios (Downswing simulations)
Wow if you extend this to the 200 level, a winning player could have a 486,432 dollar down swing. I'd be thinking PP were rigged and switching sites long before that point though.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Worst case scenarios (Downswing simulations)
Yeah, but after a million SnGs a 215 player with, say, a 10% ROI has made 215*0.1*1,000,000 = A [censored] TON OF MONEY, and he probably doesn't care much about the 500k downswing.
|
|
|