![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi you all...
Iīm a limit player that has started to play some PL with very good results in the beginning. My question to you experts in here is what kind of BB/100 is sustainable playing PL and particularly the PL 600 and PL 1000 games in party? thanks... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Simple, unspecific answer is slightly to moderately less than NL becuase less super horrible players.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would venture a guess that 6-8 BB/100 (PT stat) could be considered very good, with above that being unsustainable except for extremely good players. I would actually like to some numbers from actual pros.
JKratzer |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would lean more towards 5-6 being upper scale.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
I would lean more towards 5-6 being upper scale. [/ QUOTE ] For the $600 and $1000, I would have to concur with this. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
dont play PL before you play NL, its a harder game
and the games dont seem to be as good, nor as plentiful |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
How come PL is a harder game than NL?
To a fixed limit player I think PL is more familiar to me as it resembles FL more. The biggest difference between Pl and NL to me is that there is more postflop play in PL than NL and therefore you need to be a better postflop player when playing PL. To me that isnīt a disadvantage... |
![]() |
|
|