![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've seen reference to BB/100 being the main stat to care about, so I'm curious how I'm doing.
I've just hit my first 20,000 hands (mostly limit poker until recently), and have a 2.36 BB/100. Since May 1, I have a 3.7 BB/100 with about 6,700 hands, so it looks like all the reading and playing is paying off. Anyway, just curious where people's BB/100s are. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() ![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A great winrate will vary from different levels. I believe .5/1 can be beat for close to 4bb/100 over the long run. Maybe more. At 100/200 I imagion 1.5bb/100 would be amaising.
That said my winrate from my current database at 3/6 (about 24,000 hands) is 3.03bb/100. I've been running good [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] I dont think this is sustainable. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What's a good BB/100?
>0 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
4,592BB/100 would be great.
I settle for 2BB/100, though. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Like the first poster said i think it varies depending on the limit u play. From reading threads like this in the past it seems 4 or 5 is pretty good for party.5/1 games and 2 to 3 is good for 2/4 after that i dont know. I think anything over 1 at the higher limits is good.
There are many threads like this(understatement). Use the search button. U likely wont get many replies (nonsarcastic) because this kind of thread is beaten into the ground. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
eleventy million bazillion / 100.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
3.7 is pretty good.. but 7.2 would be great.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
NL a good one is based on big blinds, or half a big bet, but 20bb/100 is considered great, 10-15 is considered respectable.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
NL a good one is based on big blinds, or half a big bet, but 20bb/100 is considered great, 10-15 is considered respectable. [/ QUOTE ] For what level is 10-15 "respectable" by your standards? |
![]() |
|
|