|
|
|
|
#1
06-13-2005, 11:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
WSOP Main Event: You be the oddsmaker
Assuming a field of 6,000 players, what do you think are the odds are of the following players winning it all:
a) Phil Ivey b) Phil Hellmuth c) MLG d) Yourself (assuming that you play, even if you havent qualified) After careful consideration, my answers are: a) 2000:1 b) 2200:1 c) 2800:1 d) 2900:1 Thoughts? 
|
|
#2
06-13-2005, 11:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: WSOP Main Event: You be the oddsmaker
Ivey,1600:1
Hellmuth: 1300:1 MLG: 20000:1 CSC: 8:1 [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
|
|
#3
06-13-2005, 11:24 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: WSOP Main Event: You be the oddsmaker
[ QUOTE ]
Ivey,1600:1 Hellmuth: 1300:1 MLG: 20000:1 CSC: 8:1 [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] Haha, I was typing the same jopke about myself being a favorite. ~Justin
|
|
#4
06-13-2005, 11:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: WSOP Main Event: You be the oddsmaker
You think Hellmuth has a better shot than Ivey? I disagree [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
|
|
#5
06-13-2005, 11:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: WSOP Main Event: You be the oddsmaker
[ QUOTE ]
You think Hellmuth has a better shot than Ivey? I disagree [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] Ivey's still a young whippersnapper. Hellmuth has the years of experience, superior intelligence, and attitude. As much of a incomplete human being as he may be, the kid can play poker. I don't dispute that Ivey is the best of "our" generation, but Hellmuth is still better. Best in poker, IMHO. How old is Ivey, anyway?
|
|
#6
06-14-2005, 12:07 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: WSOP Main Event: You be the oddsmaker
[ QUOTE ]
How old is Ivey, anyway? [/ QUOTE ] No clue. I agree with you that Hellmuth is the best, but I think Ivey has a better game for the size of the field.
|
|
#8
06-14-2005, 06:52 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: WSOP Main Event: You be the oddsmaker
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] You think Hellmuth has a better shot than Ivey? I disagree [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] Ivey's still a young whippersnapper. Hellmuth has the years of experience, superior intelligence, and attitude. [/ QUOTE ] Phil Hellmuth has superior ATTITUDE than anyone, let alone Phil Ivey? Phil Ivey is a stone cold killer at the table, Hellmuth is a stone cold crybaby. Annie Duke nearly sent him into a coma. He's a smart guy, I like him, but...Ivey is a much better player IMHO. Ivey 100:1 Hellmuth: 750:1 Brunson 100:1 Lederer 100:1 Greenstien: 250:1 Raymer 750:1 Me 5,000:1 Men the Master 100:1 Moneymaker 4,999:1
|
|
#10
06-16-2005, 12:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: WSOP Main Event: You be the oddsmaker
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] You think Hellmuth has a better shot than Ivey? I disagree [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] Ivey's still a young whippersnapper. Hellmuth has the years of experience, superior intelligence, and attitude. As much of a incomplete human being as he may be, the kid can play poker. I don't dispute that Ivey is the best of "our" generation, but Hellmuth is still better. Best in poker, IMHO. How old is Ivey, anyway? [/ QUOTE ] Phil Hellmuth's intelligence is superior to that of Phil Ivey? That's a ridiculous statement isn't it? How would you even begin to prove that?
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
