|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
turned the low full house
I just played this hand earlier tonight and the main villian in this hand seemed to be a pretty decent player.
Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em, $ Hero (6 max, 6 handed) converter saw flop|<font color="#C00000">saw showdown</font> <font color="#C00000">Hero ($77.7)</font> UTG ($167.35) MP ($35.75) <font color="#C00000">CO ($87.55)</font> Button ($142.2) SB ($80.55) Preflop: Hero is BB with 2[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 2[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]. SB posts a blind of $0.5. <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, MP calls $1, CO calls $1, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, SB (poster) completes, Hero checks. Flop: ($4) Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 3[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 2[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(4 players)</font> SB checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $4</font>, MP folds, CO calls $4, SB calls $4. Turn: ($16) 3[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font> <font color="#CC3333">SB bets $10</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to $25</font>, <font color="#CC3333">CO raises to $50</font> I felt like I was behind after CO min raised my $25 bet, but I couldn't bring myself to fold a full boat. Does anybody lay this hand down after CO raises? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: turned the low full house
I'd re-raise my last bit of chips there in fact, I am not backing down on that board, if he has 33 or QQ or 23/Q3 so be it, there are many other hands he might take a shot with there, including AQ, a flush draw, AA, KK, KQ, A3s.
You still likely have 1 out. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] >TW< |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: turned the low full house
I wouldn't lay it down. As the other person said, there's too many hands you're ahead of here.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: turned the low full house
What hand are you afraid CO has? If he's decent he's not limping in CO with QQ. 32 (given your holding) and Q3 (your read on him being solid) both seem very unlikely. 43s or Q+paint seem more likely to me. There is no way I'm laying this down.
If he's playing quads like this I'm paying him off. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: turned the low full house
I the very least I gave him credit for trip 3s given the fact that he re-raises a bet and a raise in front of him.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: turned the low full house
Laying this down is actually a very smart play. Oh wait, what's that? You DO like money? Oh, then push it in.
-T |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: turned the low full house
This hand is fricking weird. As you said, you have to give him credit for at least trips. He's not limping with QQ. He's not playing 45 this aggressively on the turn after playing it so passively on the flop. He's probably not bluffing into a raise and a reraise... His logical holdings are pocket 3s or some kind of no/one gap suited connector with a 3 in it. Would he just call with a pair of 3's on the flop getting 2-1? I suppose it's possible, but unlikely.
This being Party Poker, I'm giving him credit for quads here. I would still push with this in a ring game, but after analyzing it objectively I think you're behind. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: turned the low full house
No. The only realistic hand that's beating you here is QQ or 33. If you have boat over boat, it's going to take a solid read for me to lay this down. It's very probable that you're beat, but I'd call and check call the river.
|
|
|