Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Televised Poker
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-09-2005, 11:09 AM
kurto kurto is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Connecticutt
Posts: 41
Default I used to think Negraneau was good....

Watching the NL Poker Heads Up Tourny on Saturday showed me that Daniel has sold his sould. Clearly he made a deal with the devil.

Daniel was playing against Jerry (Bus???). Daniel called Jerry's all-in when he was dominated (I believe it was AKos vs JQos)... I forget exactly what the hands were... but here's the weird part-

Daniel flops a straight draw. There are 2 diamonds on the board. Daniel has the jack of diamonds. His opponent has the Ace.

To make it interesting,.... Daniel's on the straight draw. He asks outloud for the 8 .... (which would give him the straight) BUT, he asked for diamonds because it would put a flush draw on the table thereby giving his opponent a chance to suck out on him. Keeping it interesting. On cue, the 8 falls.

Now his opponent realizes he has some outs. He wants a diamond. Daniel, laughing, asks for the Q which will give him the straight flush.

On cue, it falls. Daniel wins with a straight flush after asking for 2 specific cards one after the other in order.

Furthermore... on the WPT on wednesday, he was in a hand against Mizrahi (spelling?), went all his 7s against Mizrahis 8s. Furthermore, someone else folded a 7-8 so there was only 1 of each person's cards left.

On the turn, the board was:
5-6-9-x

He's dead to 1 card which... he needs his opponent to make a set... Which of course falls on the river.

** I know over many many games, you're going to see some miracle hits. But this guy, 2 incredible odds-defying events happening in major televised events?

He made a deal!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-09-2005, 11:13 AM
toots toots is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Bedford, NH
Posts: 193
Default Re: I used to think Negraneau was good....

It's gonna happen on a televised event sooner or later, and you know that when it does, it'll be shown in the final edit.

This was not a random event, which is to say that the event itself was random, but getting edited into the show was not.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-09-2005, 01:31 PM
SunOfaJack SunOfaJack is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Neither here nor there!
Posts: 36
Default Re: I used to think Negraneau was good....

[ QUOTE ]
It's gonna happen on a televised event sooner or later, and you know that when it does, it'll be shown in the final edit.

This was not a random event, which is to say that the event itself was random, but getting edited into the show was not.

[/ QUOTE ]

Above. Also the cards Daniel was asking for are not random either, other than the order of 8 then Q, but these are the logical cards to "ask for" in the kind of drama Daniel was thinking about, and so with the gagillions of hours of recorded for the hundreds of poker shows out there, it is possibly harder to believe this hasn't happened
sooner.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-09-2005, 11:36 AM
capjim capjim is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2
Default Re: I used to think Negraneau was good....

Daniel, is the best no limit hold 'em tournament player around. Also, even the best make mistakes.

I guess you have never made a mistake?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-09-2005, 11:38 AM
Sponger15SB Sponger15SB is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Isla Vista
Posts: 1,536
Default Re: I used to think Negraneau was good....

[ QUOTE ]
Daniel, is the best no limit hold 'em tournament player around. Also, even the best make mistakes.

I guess you have never made a mistake?

[/ QUOTE ]

What the hell are you talking about?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-09-2005, 12:28 PM
RicktheRuler RicktheRuler is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 68
Default Re: I used to think Negraneau was good....

I can't resist. Phil Ivey is a better tournament player than DN.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-09-2005, 01:27 PM
otnemem otnemem is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 370
Default Re: I used to think Negraneau was good....

[ QUOTE ]
Daniel, is the best no limit hold 'em tournament player around. Also, even the best make mistakes.

I guess you have never made a mistake?

[/ QUOTE ]

Welcome to the board. You've captured the prestigious title of worst first post ever. Congrats.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-09-2005, 08:03 PM
jdock99 jdock99 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 111
Default Re: I used to think Negraneau was good....

That isn't even the worst of it. I was talking to a guy once in a side game who was talking about a hand he played with Daniel at one of the tournies Daniel won (maybe the Bellagio one, I do not remember). Anyways, he says he was all in against Daniel for most of Daniel's chips when he had a full house against Daniel's under-trips. (ie. AA vs 78 on a A88 board). Then Daniel preceded to hit his 1 outer and continue on to win the tourney. How is that for luck. Of course the truth is that no matter how good you are you have to get super lucky numerous times to win one of these big buy in tournies. The truth is that irregardless of our skill or how many tournies we play, most of us will go our whole lives and never be "lucky" enough to win a large buy in, MTT, and those that do probably are not that much appreciably better than those that do not, if at all.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-09-2005, 07:36 PM
MortalWombat MortalWombat is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2
Default Re: I used to think Negraneau was good....

[ QUOTE ]
Daniel, is the best no limit hold 'em tournament player around. Also, even the best make mistakes.

I guess you have never made a mistake?

[/ QUOTE ]
Around here we have quaint, amusing tradition of actually reading posts before commenting on them. Call us crazy, but it somehow works. You should give it a try.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-09-2005, 11:42 AM
exeph exeph is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 18
Default Re: I used to think Negraneau was good....

First, it was AT vs QJ, which isn't domination. Second, AK vs QJ isn't domination. Third, who cares if the craziest two cards fell on the turn and river? How many people would call for the same cards there? How many times as he called for the similar cards in similar situations.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.