|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: What do you do here? | |||
| Check |
   
|
5 | 14.29% |
| Bet the pot ($12) |
  
|
12 | 34.29% |
| Go all-in ($18) |
  
|
10 | 28.57% |
| Other (please specify) |
  
|
8 | 22.86% |
| Voters: 35. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
04-18-2005, 09:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Who should be the democratic nominee for president in 2012?
|
|
#2
04-18-2005, 09:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Who should be the democratic nominee for president in 2012?
In 1985, nobody would have suggested that Bill Clinton would be a good nominee for President in 1992.
In 1993, nobody would have suggested the George W. Bush would be a good nominee for President in 2000.
|
|
#4
04-18-2005, 11:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Who should be the democratic nominee for president in 2012?
[ QUOTE ]
I hope Barack Obama runs, he is what this country needs to reconciliate positions. [/ QUOTE ] Why? Because he's black? Because he can deliver a speech? Obama is an unknown who Democrats are imprinting their own idea of an ideal candidate on. Hardly anybody actually knows him.
|
|
#5
04-19-2005, 12:38 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Who should be the democratic nominee for president in 2012?
[ QUOTE ]
Yep, you're right Dinasty. I hope Barack Obama runs, he is what this country needs to reconciliate positions. [/ QUOTE ] Hmm interesting and what positions of his do you find most reconciling?
|
|
#6
04-19-2005, 09:40 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Who should be the democratic nominee for president in 2012?
[ QUOTE ]
In 1985, nobody would have suggested that Bill Clinton would be a good nominee for President in 1992. In 1993, nobody would have suggested the George W. Bush would be a good nominee for President in 2000. [/ QUOTE ] And in both cases, everybody was right.
|
|
#7
04-19-2005, 04:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Who should be the democratic nominee for president in 2012?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] In 1985, nobody would have suggested that Bill Clinton would be a good nominee for President in 1992. In 1993, nobody would have suggested the George W. Bush would be a good nominee for President in 2000. [/ QUOTE ] And in both cases, everybody was right. [/ QUOTE ] Isn't it plainly obvious that they were good nominees since they went on to win the election?
|
|
#8
04-18-2005, 10:06 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Who should be the democratic nominee for president in 2012?
It makes no difference. We haven't had a legitimate election in this country since 1996, and as long as the current crop of right wing fanatics is at the helm it's a safe bet that we won't be having one in 2012 either. q/q
|
|
#9
04-18-2005, 11:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Who should be the democratic nominee for president in 2012?
[ QUOTE ]
It makes no difference. We haven't had a legitimate election in this country since 1996, and as long as the current crop of right wing fanatics is at the helm it's a safe bet that we won't be having one in 2012 either. q/q [/ QUOTE ] sigh. Talk about taking the term "bad loser" to new levels......
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode
