OJ: did he do it?

[Dead]

I say no. What say you?

[bholdr]

YES.



duh.

[zaxx19]

Of course not...

Black people = GOOD

White people = BAD

Dont you understand the idiot liberal ideology DEAD aheres to??

Remember all things can be broken down into- Good/Bad,

Colonial/Indigenous, Black/White, Liberal/Nazi....

It is really quite simple.

[Warchant88]

This really isn't a political issue, but it ended up becoming that way for the most part.

I think he did it, but I was in elementary school when it happened, so my guess isn't worth much.

[bholdr]

[ QUOTE ]
Black people = GOOD

White people = BAD

Dont you understand the idiot liberal ideology DEAD aheres to??


[/ QUOTE ]


wtf does this have to do with anything?

[caretaker1]

I'm no Republican, but I voted yes.

Also, you mean like the "idiot Republican ideology"
Good/Bad:
Pro-War/Anti-American, Conservative/Communist, Pro-life/Murderers, etc.

See how easy it is. Not sure how useful it is though.

[player24]

The evidence against OJ was overwhelming. Guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

[Broken Glass Can]

Let me say the same thing as I did in the OOT thread on OJ:

A guilty verdict means:
[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]He did it

A not guilty verdict means:
[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]He almost certainly did it just short of reasonable doubt -or-
[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]He probably did it -or-
[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]He likely did it more often than not -or-
[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]He might have done it -or-
[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]He could very well have done it -or-
[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]He's innocent -or-
[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]We the Jury are too lazy to figure it out -or-
[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]Jury nullification rules! -or-
[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]Damn, I'll be a media star if I let Him off -or-
[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]Insert reason here.


His not guilty verdict does not mean he is truly innocent. There are a lot more reasons to get to not guilty than to get to guilty, and most of them still lead you to the likelihood that OJ did it.

[jesusarenque]

[ QUOTE ]
Let me say the same thing as I did in the OOT thread on OJ:

A guilty verdict means:
[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]He did it


[/ QUOTE ]

Not necessarily

[BCPVP]

I say how can you think he didn't?
http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/proj.../Jurypage.html