Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-30-2005, 02:03 PM
StellarWind StellarWind is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 704
Default UTG+1 was really upset and it\'s all Ed Miller\'s fault

I played this session immediately after reading Ed's recent 2+2 magazine article on preflop play by a cutoff poster. I was inspired or possibly delusional. Is this a good play or too far over-the-top?

UTG+1 was quite upset when he saw my hand. Preflop he is 19/8.7 over a decent sample size. Postflop he is a typical tight/passive who traps a lot and becomes more aggressive on the big streets.

BB is quite loose/passive and the only non-tight player sitting behind me.

Party Poker 3/6 Hold'em (8 handed) converter

Preflop: Hero is CO with Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 9[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]. Hero posts a blind of $3.
<font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, <font color="#CC3333">UTG+1 raises</font>, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero (poster) 3-bets</font>, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, BB calls, UTG+1 calls.

Flop: (9.33 SB) T[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], J[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 4[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
BB checks, UTG+1 checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, BB calls, UTG+1 calls.

Turn: (6.16 BB) A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
BB checks, UTG+1 checks, Hero checks.

River: (6.16 BB) 8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">BB bets</font>, UTG+1 calls, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises</font>, BB calls, UTG+1 calls.

Final Pot: 12.16 BB
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-30-2005, 02:10 PM
stevew stevew is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 40
Default Re: UTG+1 was really upset and it\'s all Ed Miller\'s fault

I haven't read the article but question the preflop 3-bet. It did set up the rest of the hand nicely and set the tone for you for the rest of the session.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-30-2005, 02:11 PM
jskills jskills is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: in your Mom
Posts: 769
Default Re: UTG+1 was really upset and it\'s all Ed Miller\'s fault

Where does Ed Miller advocate 3-betting a pre-flop raise with Q9o?

Not this article is it?

The situation there describes calling when you're in the blinds with a hand like that and you're playing short handed. Sorry if I have the article reference wrong.

I'd have to say FOLD preflop given your read on UTG+1. What hands could you beat with Q9o that he would raise with?

The rest of the hand is standard after that of course ...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-30-2005, 02:17 PM
donger donger is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5
Default Re: UTG+1 was really upset and it\'s all Ed Miller\'s fault

Good check, you obviously dodged a checkraise on the turn. PF, I think you took it a little too far. QJo and Q9o are two very different hands. UTG+1's PF stats are almost identical to mine, and I guarantee that whatever I'm raising, it's likely to dominate Q9o. Had you seen this guy try to attack posted blinds before? If not, I think this is better folded.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-30-2005, 02:22 PM
mr pink mr pink is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: the wu, pa... bitches
Posts: 1,505
Default Re: UTG+1 was really upset and it\'s all Ed Miller\'s fault

i think Ed's article would have recommended a call preflop rather than a 3-bet.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-30-2005, 02:24 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: UTG+1 was really upset and it\'s all Ed Miller\'s fault

[ QUOTE ]
i think Ed's article would have recommended a call preflop rather than a 3-bet.

[/ QUOTE ]


me too
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-30-2005, 03:01 PM
QTip QTip is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 31
Default Re: UTG+1 was really upset and it\'s all Ed Miller\'s fault

Are we talking about the shorthanded play article here? If so, I don't think this applies at all...totally different scenario.

If not, what article are we talking about.

Muck this PF.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-30-2005, 03:18 PM
colgin colgin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 311
Default Re: UTG+1 was really upset and it\'s all Ed Miller\'s fault

[ QUOTE ]
Are we talking about the shorthanded play article here? If so, I don't think this applies at all...totally different scenario.


[/ QUOTE ]

No, this refers to Ed's two-part article on posting a blind behind the button. Totally different.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-30-2005, 02:55 PM
colgin colgin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 311
Default Re: UTG+1 was really upset and it\'s all Ed Miller\'s fault

[ QUOTE ]
I was inspired or possibly delusional. Is this a good play or too far over-the-top?

[/ QUOTE ]

Stellar,

This seems over-the-top to me. I think Q9o is significantly less strong than the types of hands he was advocating three-betting with in this situation, plus it sounds like you are unlikely to even knock out the BB here and get thereby get additional dead money in the pot. If you don't get it headsup I really don't liek your hand three-handed against an early position raiser. In fact, I am not sure you should even be calling this raise. With a bunch of tight players at the table (which is what I took away from your description) you won't be getting such great odds to just call. I vote in favor of folding but could probably be convinced to call. However, I really don't liek the isolation re-raise here.

All the best.

Colgin
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-30-2005, 02:58 PM
chief444 chief444 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 211
Default Re: UTG+1 was really upset and it\'s all Ed Miller\'s fault

I would fold preflop but I haven't read the article. 3-betting seems like the worst option. I'll read it when I have a chance though. Other than preflop everything seems very standard.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.