![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
After all of the smack that Phillips has talked about Hellmuth, I think it would be really hilarious if Phillips loses.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
i think paul phillips will agree entirely that a short term outcome based on a majority of luck does not prove anything. its quite clear that as poker players, we are dedicated to long term EV, so whether PP loses to PH or not in this one session does not change my opinion of either player in the slightest. yes, i am in the camp that says PP is better than PH, but that is only because i believe that PH is quite bad. i respect PP's play, but not quite as much as he respects himself.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
i think paul phillips will agree entirely that a short term outcome based on a majority of luck does not prove anything. its quite clear that as poker players, we are dedicated to long term EV, so whether PP loses to PH or not in this one session does not change my opinion of either player in the slightest. yes, i am in the camp that says PP is better than PH, but that is only because i believe that PH is quite bad. i respect PP's play, but not quite as much as he respects himself. [/ QUOTE ] i completely agree with you that the results would prove nothing (see my post in the ivey v. sklansky thread). I just think it would be funny if phillips loses. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A bad player with 9 bracelets?
Jesus, who are these people? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
A bad player with 9 bracelets? Jesus, who are these people? [/ QUOTE ] Obviously someone with more than 9 bracelets. Oh. Wait... [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Actually, Paul Phillips believes himself to be a horrible heads up player, so I'm sure he expects to lose, even against Hellmuth. Don't know how he's going to explain winning the first round though.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's the feature table, too, so this match-up should get substantial TV time.
Paul Phillips is also looking a lot like a homeless guy. Someone give this man a bar of soap! |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hellmuth 'quite bad'. lmao. If there was ever a case of an opinion being flat out WRONG, this is it.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
maybe my comment was a little politicaly incorrect. i suppose that when i am making bold statements about a players abilities i should be careful which words i choose. first, hellmuth is not a bad player. he certainly has a positive long term expectancy. he will continue to do moderately well in tournaments, and will win quite a few more rings before he retires. maybe my politically correct view on his skill level is that he is vastly overated on these forums, and i use the word "bad" to contrast the conformed belief that he is "excellent."
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hellmuth wins:
Short-stacked, Paul Phillips goes all in with A-8, and Phil Hellmuth calls with J-5, asking for a little "Motown" on the flop. The flop comes J-9-8, giving both players a pair, but putting Hellmuth in the lead. The last two cards come 6-K, and Paul Phillips is eliminated. Phil Hellmuth advances to Round 3, where he will face Huck Seed. (Paul Phillips says he will loan Huck Seed his Phil Hellmuth jersey if he'd like to wear it.) |
![]() |
|
|