Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Internet Gambling > Internet Gambling
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-27-2005, 06:35 AM
solucky solucky is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 50
Default lowest winning rate on party:)

Hi all

Just checked my database. Seems i cant adjust my game to the hyperloose agressive partygames. Last year i saw the flop 85% without any raise, last weeks many times 3 bets preflop from 6 players. But in fact i have on Party now a winningrate from 1 BB, thats the lowest rate from all servers !!!!!!!!. Including Paradise,AP, Interpoker, Plex

Wolfgang
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-27-2005, 06:40 AM
The-Matador The-Matador is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: At the window into your soul
Posts: 645
Default Re: lowest winning rate on party:)

What's your Party handle?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-27-2005, 01:28 PM
krazyace5 krazyace5 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 461
Default Re: lowest winning rate on party:)

[ QUOTE ]
What's your Party handle?

[/ QUOTE ]

Why you wanna donate? Feeling generous?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-27-2005, 01:36 PM
solucky solucky is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 50
Default Re: lowest winning rate on party:)

if handle means how i play. Around 18-22% flop seen agressive neutral...not really agressiv not passiv
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-27-2005, 01:45 PM
krazyace5 krazyace5 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 461
Default Re: lowest winning rate on party:)

The matador is a worthless troll. By handle he/she means screen name and are implying that you are a fish.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-27-2005, 01:55 PM
KKbluff KKbluff is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Bionic Commando
Posts: 320
Default Re: lowest winning rate on party:)

whats this database that you refer to? Are you using pokertracker? If you are you should search back and check which hands you are losing and winning on. At party a vast majority of my winning come from great trapping hands (thrips, flushes and high straits) while I noticed that my losing were generally coming from top pair.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-27-2005, 03:29 PM
Alobar Alobar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Tempe, AZ
Posts: 795
Default Re: lowest winning rate on party:)

[ QUOTE ]
while I noticed that my losing were generally coming from top pair.

[/ QUOTE ]

Dont go by that stat in poker tracker, its uber misleading.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-27-2005, 04:56 PM
KKbluff KKbluff is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Bionic Commando
Posts: 320
Default Re: lowest winning rate on party:)

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
while I noticed that my losing were generally coming from top pair.

[/ QUOTE ]

Dont go by that stat in poker tracker, its uber misleading.

[/ QUOTE ]

Would you mind explaining to me why it is so misleading?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-27-2005, 05:20 PM
Hojglad Hojglad is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 0
Default Re: lowest winning rate on party:)

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
while I noticed that my losing were generally coming from top pair.

[/ QUOTE ]

Dont go by that stat in poker tracker, its uber misleading.

[/ QUOTE ]

Would you mind explaining to me why it is so misleading?

[/ QUOTE ]
Because it counts all the hands you folded pre-flop. Filter that tab by hands not folded preflop and you will get a much more accurate winrate for that particular hand.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-27-2005, 05:23 PM
Rudbaeck Rudbaeck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 555
Default Re: lowest winning rate on party:)

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
while I noticed that my losing were generally coming from top pair.

[/ QUOTE ]

Dont go by that stat in poker tracker, its uber misleading.

[/ QUOTE ]

Would you mind explaining to me why it is so misleading?

[/ QUOTE ]

Because it includes what you would have made had you stayed in instead of folding. I discovered this after noticing that for the session I was a loser on my straight flushes. (I hadn't made any straight flushes, but PT reported two. One of them was where I folded a blind to a raise, and my 74s would have made a runner-runner straight flush.)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.