![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
From Espn's Jackpot Jay;
[ QUOTE ] A couple of weeks ago, in his backpage column in Sports Illustrated, Rick Reilly took a few shots at poker players in general, and at Raymer in particular. "This poker craze is the biggest waste of time since Stevie Wonder went to a mime festival ..." Reilly wrote. "... I haven't seen this many doughy people since the Krispy Kreme company picnic. Do they tan under 40-watt bulbs? Where is the thrill in watching guys with 300 cholesterol levels play cards and rattle their chip stacks 1,000 different ways? The current World Series of Poker champ, Greg (Fossilman) Raymer, wears back-of-the-comic-book gag glasses and gemstone necklaces and goes about 275 pounds, though a good 3 percent of that is muscle ... "These people spend more time on their butts than FDR did ... "What's ESPN going to put on next, the World Hairline-Receding Championships?" Raymer, who, like all championship poker players, is extremely competitive (despite his genial manner), responded by e-mailing Reilly a challenge to play him in a racquetball match. Reilly turned him down, claiming he had never played racquetball, and suggested they do battle in golf, a sport Reilly plays frequently. (Yes, this is the same Reilly who once famously challenged Sammy Sosa to pee into a cup on the spot after Sosa claimed he was willing to do just that to disprove rumors that he was a steroid abuser, and then publicly took the Dominican slugger to task for chickening out.) In a subsequent e-mail, Raymer politely pointed out two things to Reilly: 1.) "I thought that was the point of the column -- that a physically fit guy like you could beat a doughboy like me in any competitive activity requiring legitimate athletic ability." 2.) Even if he somehow beat Reilly in golf, it would do nothing to disprove Reilly's contention that the average poker player is a hopelessly immobile lard-butt, "since there are plenty of top golfers -- even some major tournament winners -- who are fat." [/ QUOTE ] Golf, huh? I think Russ Hamilton would be MORE than happy to take Reilly up on a golf match, and he was once 4 spins or close. Alas, Reilly doesn't have enough money. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
1.) "I thought that was the point of the column -- that a physically fit guy like you could beat a doughboy like me in any competitive activity requiring legitimate athletic ability." 2.) Even if he somehow beat Reilly in golf, it would do nothing to disprove Reilly's contention that the average poker player is a hopelessly immobile lard-butt, "since there are plenty of top golfers -- even some major tournament winners -- who are fat." [/ QUOTE ] Those are good points by Greg and I'm assuming Reilly had no response since it's likely he's a giant pussy and doesn't want to get shown up. I like the phrase "hopelessly immobile lard-butt". |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
How about Dewey Tomko? No holds barred (vaseline on the clubface ok) or straight up (rules of golf) should be fine. I think I read that he was scratch.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
scratch golfer and great poker player, not bad for a 1st grade teacher.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
(vaseline on the clubface ok) [/ QUOTE ] does this really work? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
well, you gotta be pointing straight in the first place (alignment is a big problem of mine sometimes), but it takes the spin off and makes your ball go where you're pointing.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Quote: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (vaseline on the clubface ok) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- does this really work? [/ QUOTE ] It "works" because it reduces spin. If you're a bad player who sprays the ball all over the place, it would help you. If you're a good player who can manipulate the ball flight on purpose, it would hurt you in two different ways: you wouldn't be able to draw or fade the ball, and you would lose distance control because of less backspin. I now declare myself the official 2+2 golf nerd. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You're pretty close. Golf ball mfgrs design their golf balls to have less backspin off the driver b/c less backspin (off the driver) means more distance. Club mfgrs do the same to the extent possible, i.e., design drivers to create less backspin on the ball off the tee. Part of the reason is stop the ball from "ballooning", which is one of the possible results of backspin. So, using the "grease" on the driver could, possibly, result in a longer drive.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yeah, but Russ used to be very heavy, which was part of my specific point.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
To me this guy sounds jealous and shallow.
Let's play dodge ball with him. |
![]() |
|
|