Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Televised Poker
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-16-2004, 10:42 PM
ThePopinjay ThePopinjay is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 113
Default Question for Greg, Tabletalk strategy on final table

You told Glenn Hughes, "I think we got a race if I call, a coinflip." Hughes very nonchalantly replied, "Rock and roll baby, came here to gamble." That confirmed he had overcards, or a small pair, which you have good chances vs. with 55. Surely not an overpair. Only after he said that did you call. Was this a situation where you used tabletalk to garner information? and how often do you do it?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-17-2004, 01:09 AM
J_V J_V is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,185
Default Re: Question for Greg, Tabletalk strategy on final table

I think that's what happened. Greg owned Hughes here.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-17-2004, 01:13 AM
mtdurham mtdurham is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 40
Default Re: Question for Greg, Tabletalk strategy on final table

So what exactly would he have said had he been holding pocket jacks? "Nah I've got a big hand, you're probably a big dog.." ?

I think Greg assumed Hughes had overcards because there was like a 90% chance of that being true with the range of hands Hughes woulda pushed with.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-17-2004, 02:01 AM
betgo betgo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 792
Default Re: Question for Greg, Tabletalk strategy on final table

If Raymer was eliciting information, he was doing it in a subtle way, as he didn't actually ask Hughes a question.

Hughes comments may have been strong means weak tell. He might not react that way with a big pair. He might have been better off keeping his mouth shut.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-17-2004, 02:28 AM
ThePopinjay ThePopinjay is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 113
Default Re: Question for Greg, Tabletalk strategy on final table

[ QUOTE ]
Hughes comments may have been strong means weak tell.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't think "came here to gamble" means strong. I think he made a big mistake giving up a ton of info to Greg because he knew he would be content if he got knocked out there because he was still getting like a mill $. He still shouldn't have shown that to Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-17-2004, 06:04 AM
DimensionPresident DimensionPresident is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 231
Default Re: Question for Greg, Tabletalk strategy on final table

I think he meant that his comments were colorful "strong", not "these cards will kill you!" strong. As in he was excitable.

If he would have sat there with a stone cold stare I think that screams more "big pocket pair" than anything else.

I think it would be easy to rule out a flat out bluff at that point.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-17-2004, 06:16 AM
djack djack is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 0
Default Re: Question for Greg, Tabletalk strategy on final table

It's easy to say that Hughes shouldn't have said that.

And he probably shouldn't have. But it's not a big difference either way.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-17-2004, 08:10 AM
Deorum Deorum is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Northern California
Posts: 68
Default Re: Question for Greg, Tabletalk strategy on final table

One thing that you guys are overlooking is that Hughes may
actually have wanted to be called by a small pocket
pair. He may have decided that his best chances for winning
the whole thing would be to double up on that hand, rather
than trying to grind his way up to chip leader, in which
case his telling Raymer "yes, I have overcards - let us run
it out" would not only have accomplished that goal, but
would have also been tactically sound in the sense that
Hughes would be getting Raymer to do something that Hughes
wanted him to do.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-17-2004, 08:57 AM
betgo betgo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 792
Default Re: Question for Greg, Tabletalk strategy on final table

I think you are right. Hughes deduced that Raymer had an underpair, and he wanted to gamble. Visions of $5M were dancing through his head. He had a hand that was only a slight underdog to an underpair. He was encouraging Raymer to call. However, I would think he would be better off just picking up the blinds.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-17-2004, 08:19 AM
pshreck pshreck is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2
Default Re: Question for Greg, Tabletalk strategy on final table

Yeah, I think he wanted a call when he heard that. He WANTS a coinflip at this point (assuming he cant get better). When Greg says "I think it's a coinflip", Hughes knows hes most likely not dominated and wants to get a chance to double up.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.