|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Why are the smart states for Kerry?
California, New York, Mass etc are very lopsided towards
Kerry while the stupid states e.g Alabama, Texas ( except Austin) Utah etc are for Bush. The whole election could come down to a fairly stupid state like florida. I don't mean to insult individuals, these states are only statistically stupid, even Utah has that guy that won a million on Jeapardy, and Montana has Ray Zee. D. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why are the smart states for Kerry?
Hawaii produced me (smart), but let me move to California (stupid). they're very pro dem.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why are the smart states for Kerry?
Some of the smart states get that way by people moving
from the stupid states but I would classify Hawaii as relatively smart in a party-school kind of way. D. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why are the smart states for Kerry?
Hawaii's had a huge brain drain problem in the past decade or so. the political arena is stagnant, and the economy has all of its eggs in a single basket (tourism) that is likely peaked out due to limited resources (land space). I would classify Hawaii as a stupid state, on the whole.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why are the smart states for Kerry?
How are California and New York smart states? One has elected two actors for governor, and the other a woman whose only qualification for office was that she tried to push through the most ill conceived health care plan in American history in her role as first lady.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why are the smart states for Kerry?
I see you are from the stupid part, Houston of a very stupid state. I think you are trying to slight Hillary but somehow you don't even know what position she was elected to ( its Senator not Gov ). Maybe someone from CA or even Washington state can have a coffee with you and explain it.
D. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why are the smart states for Kerry?
[ QUOTE ]
I see you are from the stupid part, Houston of a very stupid state. I think you are trying to slight Hillary but somehow you don't even know what position she was elected to ( its Senator not Gov ). Maybe someone from CA or even Washington state can have a coffee with you and explain it. D. [/ QUOTE ] You are aware that cprhou comes across as much more intelligent than you, right? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why are the smart states for Kerry?
I never said Clinton was elected governor of NY. Only that New Yorkers, in their ultimate wisdom, chose to make her an elected official.
And she doesn't need me to slight her. She has done enough on her own to earn her standing as a politician with one of the highest "unfavorable" ratings in recent times. I certainly appreciate the unwarranted personal attack, and I stand in awe at its level of sophistication. It's right up there with calling someone "gay" or "retarded." Well done, Steele. As someone with degrees in Political Science and History, I am happy to debate current events issues with you at any time. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why are the smart states for Kerry?
[ QUOTE ]
How are California and New York smart states? One has elected two actors for governor, and the other a woman whose only qualification for office was that she tried to push through the most ill conceived health care plan in American history in her role as first lady. [/ QUOTE ] How about that they're smart in the sense that they're less stupid on average than other Americans. And there's no telling what kind of unqualified weirdos states like Alabama would vote for if any celebrities actually felt like becoming the governor of such a dreadful place. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why are the smart states for Kerry?
I guess its the stupid Californians who realize they are outsmarted at home that are overrunning the the rest of the west like locusts. Perhaps only stupid New Yorkers are the ones flooding into FL. Or maybe they just don't want to live in an over taxed, over regulated enivironment anymore. No, you're right. They're stupid.
|
|
|