|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Do we limp low PP (22-55) UTG?
-ev? +ev?
thx |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Do we limp low PP (22-55) UTG?
I would say yes in 6 max because of the huge implied odds. I don't know about full ring.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Do we limp low PP (22-55) UTG?
i would say it depends on the table.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Do we limp low PP (22-55) UTG?
I openraise with lots of hands UTG, 54s for example.
Why should I make this relatively small exception to the rule? I am able to outplay most of my opponents postflop anyways. Usually people fold to a c-bet. And when I hit my hand is well disguised. Edit: I play low limits, mind. 6-max. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Do we limp low PP (22-55) UTG?
I play full ring at Full tilt, and i limp 22-JJ UTG
The reason i think it is +EV to limp the 22-55 UTG, is....If it is limped round, you obviously have value to hit your set. If some1 standard raises to $4, you call and hit your set...the players at this level will pay you off with their entire stack with TPTK or an overpair, so i still think you have set value |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Do we limp low PP (22-55) UTG?
I play full ring 25 to 200NL and I limp 22-TT utg. The site I play most of my games at the tables are very passive and 90% of the players will only minraise or raise 4xbb max regardless of number of limpers so I always get odds to draw to a set.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Do we limp low PP (22-55) UTG?
I limp these UTG at 6max if the table is relatively passive preflop - lots of multiway limped pots, a decent amount of the stupid preflop minraise, etc. These tables will let you see a flop cheaply and pay you off royally enough of the time to make it well worth it. Can't say I do this at higher limit tables, aggressive tables, tight tables, or full tables.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Do we limp low PP (22-55) UTG?
Hell yea I limp em. Theres always several people at the tables I frequent that live by the slogan "Top pair = Not going ANYWHERE".
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Do we limp low PP (22-55) UTG?
But can anyone explain why they wont OPENRAISE in 6-max with 22-55?
With small pairs we are looking for a set, and 222 is almost always equal to 777. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Do we limp low PP (22-55) UTG?
[ QUOTE ]
But can anyone explain why they wont OPENRAISE in 6-max with 22-55? With small pairs we are looking for a set, and 222 is almost always equal to 777. [/ QUOTE ] utg? |
|
|