![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
While this is undoubtedly good for his grades, the rationale I've heard is silly.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
i heard about this....for what?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
And the rationale is....?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
And the rationale is....? [/ QUOTE ] Ask Dynasty. [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img] |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I thought banning really good strategy posters was against the rules.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
I thought banning really good strategy posters was against the rules. [/ QUOTE ] yeah, really good strat posters can just go wild and do whatever they want. that seems like a great idea. they too need to be held accountable for their actions and abide by the rules. while permanent bannings for good posters is going to be rare, it's going to happen. in this case it's a short term banning and people should chill the [censored] out. c |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Or people who have consistantly been humorless could start being less so.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Or people who have consistantly been humorless could start being less so. [/ QUOTE ] |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Or people who have consistantly been humorless could start being less so. [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well if they did anything within reason. I have no idea what happened or why, so I will just quit posting in this thread.
|
![]() |
|
|