|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Party Super Musings
If you played the Party "Super" Weekday tournaments 4 times a week, 50 weeks out of the year, you'd need to win one (or an equivalent amount in smaller cashes) just to break even.
Discuss. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party Super Musings
This is why its so important to keep accurate records of your tournament play IMO.
A lot of players can win in the cash games and don't realize what a major leak MTT play is for them. This is also why ITM% is not as useless a stat as some would like you to believe. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party Super Musings
[ QUOTE ]
A lot of players can win in the cash games and don't realize what a major leak MTT play is for them. [/ QUOTE ] Hmmmm, I have always thought it was the other way around. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party Super Musings
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] A lot of players can win in the cash games and don't realize what a major leak MTT play is for them. [/ QUOTE ] Hmmmm, I have always thought it was the other way around. [/ QUOTE ] Anybody up for some TD lowball? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party Super Musings
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] A lot of players can win in the cash games and don't realize what a major leak MTT play is for them. [/ QUOTE ] Hmmmm, I have always thought it was the other way around. [/ QUOTE ] Unless he is talking LHE cash game players losing at MTT's, you are right. Most NL cash game players can win easily at tournaments, while the opposite is not true. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party Super Musings
[ QUOTE ]
Most NL cash game players can win easily at tournaments, while the opposite is not true. [/ QUOTE ] Maybe my wording wasnt clear, but this is exactly what I meant. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party Super Musings
Winning 1 out of 200 supers to me is awful. I've played in a very small sample size of about 30 of them but have already cashed 7 times. I can't imagine playing 199 supers without even getting cracked just inside the bubble. And 200 supers, does anyone realize how many that is? If I played 200 supers I would hope for 5-6 final tables at least. Can't wait till I get ripped on for this one.
-Ace |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party Super Musings
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Most NL cash game players can win easily at tournaments, while the opposite is not true. [/ QUOTE ] Maybe my wording wasnt clear, but this is exactly what I meant. [/ QUOTE ] Your wording was clear. I was just agreeing with you. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party Super Musings
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] A lot of players can win in the cash games and don't realize what a major leak MTT play is for them. [/ QUOTE ] Hmmmm, I have always thought it was the other way around. [/ QUOTE ] Unless he is talking LHE cash game players losing at MTT's, you are right. Most NL cash game players can win easily at tournaments, while the opposite is not true. [/ QUOTE ] I was speaking of LHE players, as that is what the majority of cash game players are. Obviously a good NL cash game player should be able to employ many of the same tactics in a NL tournament. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party Super Musings
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] A lot of players can win in the cash games and don't realize what a major leak MTT play is for them. [/ QUOTE ] Hmmmm, I have always thought it was the other way around. [/ QUOTE ] Unless he is talking LHE cash game players losing at MTT's, you are right. Most NL cash game players can win easily at tournaments, while the opposite is not true. [/ QUOTE ] I was speaking of LHE players, as that is what the majority of cash game players are. Obviously a good NL cash game player should be able to employ many of the same tactics in a NL tournament. [/ QUOTE ] That doesn't sound correct to me. I thought NL was more popular these days. What data are you basing your statement on? |
|
|