|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Dump?
Hand #8326037-14 at TurboSnG-0015g (No Limit Hold'em Sit and Go)
Powered by UltimateBet Started at 12/Sep/05 00:38:06 Mel19 is at seat 0 with 1120. seamoes is at seat 1 with 1460. Raven-Jackson is at seat 2 with 1195. pac 27 is at seat 3 with 1825. fatshady is at seat 4 with 1715. sacker23 is at seat 5 with 1685. The button is at seat 3. fatshady posts the small blind of 15. sacker23 posts the big blind of 30. Mel19: -- -- seamoes: -- -- Raven-Jackson: 4d Ad pac 27: -- -- fatshady: -- -- sacker23: -- -- Pre-flop: Mel19 calls. seamoes folds. Raven-Jackson calls. pac 27 folds. fatshady folds. sacker23 checks. Flop (board: Jc Ts 5s): sacker23 checks. Mel19 checks. Raven-Jackson checks. Turn (board: Jc Ts 5s 3c): sacker23 bets 105. Mel19 raises to 210. Raven-Jackson folds. sacker23 re-raises to 315. Mel19 calls. River (board: Jc Ts 5s 3c Kd): sacker23 bets 735. Mel19 goes all-in for 775. sacker23 folds. Mel19 is returned 40 (uncalled). Hand #8326037-14 Summary: No rake is taken for this hand. Mel19 wins 2205. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Dump?
i don't understand.
citanul |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Dump?
This seemed like a flagrant chip dump. 6 person table, turbo blinds and Mel19 goes on to win after taking an early chip lead. Doubling up with the turbo blinds gives a player a big advantage.
Wanted a second opinion, as I am considering reporting it for what good it will do. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Dump?
oh. i duno. maybe? looks pretty stupid, honestly, so it might be chip dumping. might as well report it.
a better title might be: "is this chip dumping?" instead of "dump" citanul |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Dump?
[ QUOTE ]
a better title might be: "is this chip dumping?" instead of "dump" [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, I initially thought this was another thread about when to take toilet breaks during a set [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Dump?
If you were playing at a $1,000,000 buy in game, maybe you could report this. Just remember there's a lot of bonehead players out there and the simplest explanation is often the correct one.
|
|
|