![]() |
|
View Poll Results: What percentage is definitely too little? | |||
something >14% |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
14 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
12 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
10 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
8 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
6 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
5 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
4 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
3 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 | 5.56% |
2 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | 11.11% |
1 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
3 | 16.67% |
<1% |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
12 | 66.67% |
Voters: 18. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A few regulars have expressed some frustration over the winrate threads....what does everyone else think?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
we need a sticky that says:
5-10NL: >3 good >5 very good 10-20NL: >2 good >3.5 very good LONGTERMLONGTERMLONGTERMLONGTERMLONGTERMLONGTERMLO NGTERM LONGTERMLONGTERMLONGTERMLONGTERMLONGTERMLONGTERMLO NGTERM LONGTERMLONGTERMLONGTERMLONGTERMLONGTERMLONGTERMLO NGTERM LONGTERMLONGTERMLONGTERMLONGTERMLONGTERMLONGTERMLO NGTERM |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This sums up all win-rate questions. I don't see what else there is to gather from discussing it 50000 million times.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think they are helpful, but they can all go into brags beats and variance. Perfect form for them. Here they just clutter.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
we need a sticky that says: 5-10NL: >3 good >5 very good 10-20NL: >2 good >3.5 very good LONGTERMLONGTERMLONGTERMLONGTERMLONGTERMLONGTERMLO NGTERM LONGTERMLONGTERMLONGTERMLONGTERMLONGTERMLONGTERMLO NGTERM LONGTERMLONGTERMLONGTERMLONGTERMLONGTERMLONGTERMLO NGTERM LONGTERMLONGTERMLONGTERMLONGTERMLONGTERMLONGTERMLO NGTERM [/ QUOTE ] And it would be nice if someone defined LONGTERM in the sticky too. Some people think this is 50k, and have no concept of variance/std dev and confidence intervals. Putting the formula in the sticky would go a long way IMO. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What's wrong with winrate threads? I have always been extremely curious to learn how much others make.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
What's wrong with winrate threads? I have always been extremely curious to learn how much others make. [/ QUOTE ]I agree 100%. If you are annoyed by winrate threads, guess what, don't read them. A thread titled "Avg. Winrate of a full time 5-10 player?" isn't too hard to figure out it's going to be winrate discussion. This is similar if fsuplayer makes a thread, I know it'll be garbage so I can easily skip over it without reading it [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img] |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
i was beginning to think i was shooting at a helpless target. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I agree also.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
What's wrong with winrate threads? [/ QUOTE ] Agreed. There is usually something gained from them other than just a simple >3.5bb/100 rule. I think if people posted winrate threads and there were only a couple of regulars posting comments such as "buzz off" or "wrong forum", or throwing up the AZK sign, then deleting would be warranted. But of you look at many of the winrate threads, they are fairly long, so obviously something is being discussed. I think as long as people put winrate in the subject, those who want to avoid them can. |
![]() |
|
|