![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
kay should i up my aggro i don't know right now i am playijng 33/24/2.5 its a high variance style
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() ![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bugstud: your graph doesn't look much swingier if at all. you have 1/4 the winrate so your graph only goes up 1/4 as high on the vertical axis. so visually those look like larger swings than subfallen but when you take into account the scale and the winrate you can see they are not that much different.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Bugstud: your graph doesn't look much swingier if at all. you have 1/4 the winrate so your graph only goes up 1/4 as high on the vertical axis. so visually those look like larger swings than subfallen but when you take into account the scale and the winrate you can see they are not that much different. [/ QUOTE ] yeah I'm really bad at poker btw, look at the graph again |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Bugstud: your graph doesn't look much swingier if at all. you have 1/4 the winrate so your graph only goes up 1/4 as high on the vertical axis. so visually those look like larger swings than subfallen but when you take into account the scale and the winrate you can see they are not that much different. [/ QUOTE ] bugstuds graph is way swingier. thats the nature of a shortterm graph tho. winrate doesnt factor into it. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Bugstud: your graph doesn't look much swingier if at all. you have 1/4 the winrate so your graph only goes up 1/4 as high on the vertical axis. so visually those look like larger swings than subfallen but when you take into account the scale and the winrate you can see they are not that much different. [/ QUOTE ] bugstuds graph is way swingier. thats the nature of a shortterm graph tho. winrate doesnt factor into it. [/ QUOTE ] i am pretty sure it isn't... remember that a 2bb/100 player going on a 200BB downswing over 10K hands is basically the same as a .5bb/100 player going on a 350bb downswing over 10K hands. also: winrate absolutely does factor in. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Bugstud: your graph doesn't look much swingier if at all. you have 1/4 the winrate so your graph only goes up 1/4 as high on the vertical axis. so visually those look like larger swings than subfallen but when you take into account the scale and the winrate you can see they are not that much different. [/ QUOTE ] bugstuds graph is way swingier. thats the nature of a shortterm graph tho. winrate doesnt factor into it. [/ QUOTE ] i am pretty sure it isn't... remember that a 2bb/100 player going on a 200BB downswing over 10K hands is basically the same as a .5bb/100 player going on a 350bb downswing over 10K hands. also: winrate absolutely does factor in. [/ QUOTE ] this makes now sense. last time i checked 350>200. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wish mine looked like yours
|
![]() |
|
|