|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Hand vs. ScubaChuck@33
Curious what people think of this hand:
NL Texas Hold'em $30 Buy-in + $3 Entry Fee Level:6 Blinds(100/200) Seat 5 is the button Total number of players : 5 Seat 2: jalbertb ( $1860 ) Seat 4: elkboy67 ( $654 ) Seat 5: Hero ( $1573 ) Seat 9: Turlockrep ( $2993 ) Seat 10: Scuba ( $920 ) Trny:18163176 Level:6 Blinds(100/200) ** Dealing down cards ** Dealt to Hero [ Th Qd ] jalbertb folds.elkboy67 folds. Hero is all-In [1573] Turlockrep folds. Scuba will be using his time bank for this hand. Scuba is all-In [720] ** Dealing Flop ** [ 9h, 3c, 5d ] ** Dealing Turn ** [ 6h ] ** Dealing River ** [ 7h ] Scuba shows [ 4h, As ] a straight, three to seven. Hero shows [ Th, Qd ] high card queen. Hero wins 653 chips from side pot #1 with high card queen. Scuba wins 1940 chips from the main pot |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Hand vs. ScubaChuck@33
if he knows youre 2+2 it doesnt seem terrible, although it does seem fairly.. marginal, i guess.
if he doesnt know your 2+2, and doesnt have some other "ninja read" (bones, 2005) on you, it seems pretty bad. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Hand vs. ScubaChuck@33
Good push, easy call v. a 2+2er.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Hand vs. ScubaChuck@33
I id'ed myself to him at the beginning of tourney as a 2+2
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Hand vs. ScubaChuck@33
Well there was your mistake. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Hand vs. ScubaChuck@33
[ QUOTE ]
I id'ed myself to him at the beginning of tourney as a 2+2 [/ QUOTE ] Then this looks fairly standard. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Hand vs. ScubaChuck@33
[ QUOTE ]
Good push, easy call v. a 2+2er. [/ QUOTE ] Does this mean I shouldn't be calling *anybody's* all-in with A4? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Hand vs. ScubaChuck@33
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Good push, easy call v. a 2+2er. [/ QUOTE ] Does this mean I shouldn't be calling *anybody's* all-in with A4? [/ QUOTE ] You should... easy call v. anyone. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Hand vs. ScubaChuck@33
[ QUOTE ]
You should... easy call v. anyone. [/ QUOTE ] Only against a maniacal pushing range is this anything but a CLEAR fold. Even if he's pushing 22+, A2s+, A3o+, KTs+, KJo+, QJs+ (ie - a wide range), this is an easy fold. Button has to be pushing 35% of hands (22+, A2+, K5o+, K2s+, Q9o+, Q8s+, J9s+) for this to be a a +0.5% call. From the button, with almost 8xBB, I don't think you can give a random opponent this wide a pushing range very often. Perhaps, given Scuba knew his opponent was a 2+2'er, this was a marginally decent call (and I'm sure that information is why he made the call). But, absent that information, I do believe this is a fold, gentlemen. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Hand vs. ScubaChuck@33
good post Sammy....
Call me crazy but I hadn't realized A4 was an 'easy' call. I'd almost rather call K4 than Ace four. (If we're playing high card than my king might still be good - plus more people push aces than kings - meaning a higher percentage of the time I'm NOT a 3:1 dog.) now I kinda suck....but I was shocked to see the agreement of A4 being an easy call there. |
|
|