|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
standard uncertainty
PR 3/6 4 Handed
Hero is Button with A [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]Q [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] Preflop: CO folds, Hero raises, SB 3-bets, BB folds, Hero caps, SB calls Flop: 7 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 2 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] J [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] SB bets, Hero calls Turn: 6 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] SB bets, Hero ?? SB is 36/25/1.5 over ~30 hands, and I get the impression that these numbers are going to increase over time. I think calling sucks, but do you like raise/folding and checking behind on the river UI, or just letting go? I tend to do one, although this time I did the other, but I've been in a slide so I'm questioning everything. I also think raising the flop is a reasonable move, yes? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: standard uncertainty
i like just letting it go.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: standard uncertainty
[ QUOTE ]
i like just letting it go. [/ QUOTE ] Same. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: standard uncertainty
I raise flop here if you are planning on calling the turn.
If you are not, then call flop, fold turn UI. True |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: standard uncertainty
Raising the flop in this spot might get you 3-bet, which really sucks. However, getting 3-bet might define his hand a little better allowing you to more comfortably fold on the turn. But players like this really tend to get over aggro in 3 to 4-handed situations. Some players will bet/3-bet overs in this spot. Ideally here I'd raise the flop (not get 3-bet), check behind UI on the turn, and call any river. I'd really like to show this hand down as I'm ahead of a lot of Aces and other broadway combos with which he'd 3-bet preflop.
I don't know, raising the flop and keeping the initiative makes this hand a bit easier to play. But playing it the way you did the 3 options of folding the turn, calling down, and raising the turn for a "free showdown" have merit. Raising the turn gives you a bit more fold equity than raising the flop. With all my indecisiveness here, I think I'm getting to showdown somehow. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: standard uncertainty
[ QUOTE ]
Raising the flop in this spot might get you 3-bet, which really sucks. However, getting 3-bet might define his hand a little better allowing you to more comfortably fold on the turn. But players like this really tend to get over aggro in 3 to 4-handed situations. Some players will bet/3-bet overs in this spot. Ideally here I'd raise the flop (not get 3-bet), check behind UI on the turn, and call any river. I'd really like to show this hand down as I'm ahead of a lot of Aces and other broadway combos with which he'd 3-bet preflop. I don't know, raising the flop and keeping the initiative makes this hand a bit easier to play. But playing it the way you did the 3 options of folding the turn, calling down, and raising the turn for a "free showdown" have merit. Raising the turn gives you a bit more fold equity than raising the flop. With all my indecisiveness here, I think I'm getting to showdown somehow. [/ QUOTE ] IMO if we raise the flop after capping preflop it doesn't do much to define his hand because ours is so misrepresented |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: standard uncertainty
--blind response--
My standard line here is to raise this flop, check through the turn, and call a river bet unimproved. That wins the most from other whiffed over hands, and gives me an escape route if I encounter undue aggression. If I get played back at I can release, and if I improve I can raise. This is the kind of hand that can beat other UI overs without improving, and I want to show it down against a lag. As played I think you have to drop. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: standard uncertainty
Results:
<font color="white">Hero usually raises, but folds this time. This feels weird, so he posts the hand on 2+2. </font> |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: standard uncertainty
I feel that since you capped preflop calling the flop places a sticker on your forhead that says you have big overcards so he is going to continue to hammer you. Raise the flop.
|
|
|