Hmm, what do you think? Roulette related

#1 10-30-2005, 04:22 PM

im not the creator of this, just wanted to get some opinions.

http://www.gamblingstrats.com/roulettes/

#2 10-30-2005, 05:29 PM

i was just thinking, it looks like he is just trying to get people to sign up to the casinos (assuming he is an affiliate). but i am still tempted to try it..

PokerCat69 · #3 10-31-2005, 02:04 PM

Systems that have you bet based on previous spin outcomes will not win. Nor will any fancy progression.

Roulette has been beaten with the use of a computer that can project where the ball will land. This is cheating of course.
What has me interested is I've heard some people can predict where the ball is going to land without using a computer.

playersare · #4 10-30-2005, 07:05 PM

it's hogwash. any circumstantial pattern of previous spins has absolutely no bearing on the probability of the next spin.

MCS · #5 10-30-2005, 07:27 PM

[ QUOTE ]
it's hogwash. any circumstantial pattern of previous spins has absolutely no bearing on the probability of the next spin.

[/ QUOTE ]

The author of the webpage states at the start that the roulette code specifically prohibits 16 consecutive reds or 16 consecutive blacks. So what you say is allegedly false.

That being said, I don't really believe such a prohibition exists, so I think it's bogus.

#6 10-30-2005, 07:36 PM

i believe it states that either the 1st 12, 2nd 12, or 3rd 12 sets of numbers must come up within 16 spins, and it was created like that to not doubt the casino's randomness.

although, wouldnt that algorithm take out the randomness? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

The Goober · #7 10-30-2005, 07:40 PM

[ QUOTE ]
The author of the webpage states at the start that the roulette code specifically prohibits 16 consecutive reds or 16 consecutive blacks. So what you say is allegedly false.

[/ QUOTE ]

He actually says that the code prohibits 16 consecutive spins in the same 2/3 of the wheel. If this is true, than his plan seems unnecessarily complicated. All you have to do is a simple martingale-like approach where you bet the same 3rd of the wheel every time and every time you lose you increase you bet enough to offset your loss (you don't have to double every time, since the payout is 2:1). As long as you have the bankroll to lose 15 times in a row (and don't hit the table max) you are guaranteed a profit.

But I don't believe for a second that any online casino would be stupid enough to put such an easily-exploitable piece of code in their RNG. This "system" isn't exactly rocket science.

#8 10-30-2005, 07:59 PM

i guess its not difficult, only difficult to be obervant of. im still tempted to try it, but like you said, would be kind of stupid for the casino to place something such as that. who knows? eh./

flatline · #9 10-30-2005, 09:16 PM

You are either stupid, or you are spamming. I'm torn on which one it is.

SamIAm · #10 11-01-2005, 10:54 AM

[ QUOTE ]
a simple martingale-like approach where you bet ... and every time you lose you increase you bet enough to offset your loss

[/ QUOTE ]It's a shame that 2+2 thinks "Martingale" means "Double your bet to offset your loss". It'd be like if I used "Card Game" to always mean "Crazy Pineapple Hi/Lo with a Full Kill".

Mathworld.
-Sam